Re: All Numeric Accounts (Again)

procmail

Re: All Numeric Accounts (Again)

1998-02-25 09:33:49

On Wed, Feb 25, 1998 at 10:22:24AM +0200, era eriksson wrote:

So you wouldn't be suspicious if your normal inbox got mail addressed
for someone's pager?


    Not with the new two-way pagers or PCS services, which can
be used to actually send as well as receive.

-- 
Brad Knowles                           _                       _ 
brad(_at_)colltech(_dot_)com                     |_| C o l l e c t i v e |_|
http://www.colltech.com               |_     technologies      _|
"Managing Systems and Networks"         [] A Pencom Company  []

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
All Numeric Accounts (Again), Felix Tilley Re: All Numeric Accounts (Again), gsutter Re: All Numeric Accounts (Again), Ralph Sims Re: All Numeric Accounts (Again), era eriksson Re: All Numeric Accounts (Again), Brad Knowles <= Re: All Numeric Accounts (Again), Lyle D. Sanders Re: All Numeric Accounts (Again), Felix Tilley

Previous by Date:	Re: A (possibly) novel way of dealing with spam/UBE, kirk
Next by Date:	Re: A (possibly) novel way of dealing with spam/UBE, Matthew G. Saroff (Reply to the pobox address)
Previous by Thread:	Re: All Numeric Accounts (Again), era eriksson
Next by Thread:	Re: All Numeric Accounts (Again), Lyle D. Sanders
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]