Re: MIME bugs

procmail

Re: MIME bugs

1998-08-11 18:14:26


Maybe the point of the note I saw was that there are numerous strcpy, strcmp,
and strcat's that exist in procmail's source, which might need conversion
to strncpy, etc, etc., so as to minimize potential future buffer overflows.

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dale Harris  <rodmur(_at_)csuchico(_dot_)edu>   PGP KeyID: E26EC5FD      
http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~rodmur/
|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
MIME bugs, D.A. Harris Re: MIME bugs, Andrew Kelley Re: MIME bugs, D.A. Harris Re: MIME bugs, D.A. Harris <= Re: (procmail) Re: MIME bugs, Reto Lichtensteiger Procmail test suite? (was: Re: MIME bugs), Liviu Daia Re: Procmail test suite? (was: Re: MIME bugs), D.A. Harris Re: Procmail test suite? (was: Re: MIME bugs), Liviu Daia Autoreply w/ To: field as the from address, Mark J. Miller Re: Procmail test suite? (was: Re: MIME bugs), Philip Guenther Re: Procmail test suite? (was: Re: MIME bugs), Liviu Daia Re: MIME bugs, John D. Hardin Re: MIME bugs, Liviu Daia Re: MIME bugs, Chris Johnson

Previous by Date:	Re: MIME bugs, D.A. Harris
Next by Date:	Re: (procmail) Okay.... this should be easy, Jerry Shenk (linux)
Previous by Thread:	Re: MIME bugs, D.A. Harris
Next by Thread:	Re: (procmail) Re: MIME bugs, Reto Lichtensteiger
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]