On 27 January 1999, homega(_at_)vlc(_dot_)servicom(_dot_)es
<homega(_at_)vlc(_dot_)servicom(_dot_)es>
wrote:
Thanks, it was my mistake. Anyhow, I got this message to procmail's
folder just now, whereas I got the same copy to my default folder a
few hours ago (since you both sent it to me and cc'ed to the list).
See the delay I meant? Is this a normal behaviour with procmail?
It's the normal sendmail lag, if an addresses in a big recipient
list is unreachable for some reasons, it will delay delivery for all
other recipients after it. Now, if everybody would be using QMail or
Postfix instead of sendmail... But that's not going to happen any time
soon.
Also, what's the difference between typing :0 and :0: ?
RTFM. With :0: the target folder is locked, with :0 it isn't (or
there's no target folder in that recipe at all, like in :0f).
Regards,
Liviu Daia
--
Dr. Liviu Daia e-mail: daia(_at_)stoilow(_dot_)imar(_dot_)ro
Institute of Mathematics web page: http://www.imar.ro/~daia
of the Romanian Academy PGP key: http://www.imar.ro/~daia/daia.asc