A suggestion I liked concerning my script was to
use sed to change the subject line, specifically
:0fhw
* ^TO_gatekeeper\+[0-9]+@
* ^Subject: *re:.*@
* Any.other.conditions.you.need??
| sed -e '/^Subject:/s/\*-.*$//'
I think I understand what sed is used for, and that
it uses regular expressions like procmail (??)
I don't think i have this line down 100%, here in my
own code is what I think it happening:
The subject line in the header is
"Subject: Re: MailWeb: Test A +-bozo(_at_)bozo(_dot_)com"
:0fwic
* ^Subject:[ ]+\/.*
| ( sed -e '/^Subject:/s/\*-.*$//' ; \
formail -rkb -I "From: $REALSENDER" -I "To: $ORIGINATOR" \
-I "Return-Path:$REALSENDER" -I "Sender:$REALSENDER" \
-I "Reply-To: $REALSENDER") \
| $SENDMAIL -oi $ORIGINATOR
The recipe :0
f consider the pipe as a filter
w tells Procmail to hang around and wait for the script to
finish.
c operate on a copy (a copy of every email is saved in a dir)
i ignore write errors
sed -e '/^Subject:/s/\*-.*$//'
dont need the -e option?
/^Subject:/ match this
s sed substitution flag
/\ extract
substitute anything starting with "*-" followed by
anything any number of times up to the end of the line
with // or with nothing. Seems right to me.
You enter the recipe, change the subject line, do formail
then do sendmail. The above corrupts my mailbox. Is this
syntax better?
:0fwci
* ^Subject:[ ]+\/.*
| sed -e '/^Subject:/s/\*-.*$//' ; \
| (formail -rkb -I "From: $REALSENDER" -I "To: $ORIGINATOR" \
-I "Return-Path:$REALSENDER" -I "Sender:$REALSENDER" \
-I "Reply-To: $REALSENDER") \
| $SENDMAIL -oi $ORIGINATOR
Thanks Tom
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail