Barton Hodges <barton(_at_)gcmcomputers(_dot_)com> writes:
I'm including the solution, the problem is listed below it.
...
:0c
* ! .*for <UserA(_at_)(_dot_)*>;
* ! ^TO_UserA@
{ }
:0cE
UserA/in
...
As I've said on this list at least half a dozen times: THIS DOES NOT
WORK RELIABLY. Please read the following message for the details.
http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/procmail/2001-11/msg00174.html
(This is old news, folks. For example, here's a posting I made *five
years ago* on the topic:
http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/procmail/1996-02/msg00151.html
If there's some place we should put a warning about this that people
would see before getting too far, please tell us where!)
Philip Guenther
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail