At 15:25 2001-06-21 -0500, David W. Tamkin wrote:
My first thought was that Kip was running an old version of procmail that
didn't grok ^TO_, so it was seeing the equivalent of ^TO()_ and looking for
a literal underscore, but Kip said it was version 3.15.
Further, Kip's logfile shows the regexp being used for ^TO_:
"(^((Original-)?(Resent-)?(To|Cc|Bcc)|(X-Envelope|Apparently(-Resent)?)-To):(.*[^-a-zA-Z0-9_.])?)(_dot_)*root(_at_)hctc\(_dot_)net"
versus mine:
"(^((Original-)?(Resent-)?(To|Cc|Bcc)|(X-Envelope|Apparently(-Resent)?)-To):(.*[^-a-zA-Z0-9_.])?)root(_at_)hctc\(_dot_)net"
The only different being that in mine, I omitted the '.*' from in front of
the address spec, since it isn't needed - but also as I indicated in my
last post, the original regexp DOES in fact match anyway.
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail