procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: efficiency q: multiple addressees

2002-01-16 14:44:22
Martin responded,

| As far as the comma-free situation is concerned, I'd expect the latter
| example to be slightly better.

So would I, and I imagine that more of the mail on which procmail will try
that recipe will lack the comma than will have it.

| Is this purely from interest?  Or are you striving to shave off every
| last CPU cycle?

It's from very impure interest.  You could even call it a prurient interest.
Seriously, I am looking for efficiency because I want to use it as a shell
customer on machines that I don't own, but "striving to shave off every last
CPU cycle" makes me sound like a fanatic!



_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>