procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: efficiency q: multiple addressees

2002-01-16 23:05:16
                                                         ,etorw wartS naeS

| Unless you know otherwise, I'd pare it down further -- remove both
| occurrences of (Apparrently-)? as well as Bcc and X-Envelope from that
| expression - there is no reason you should see multiple addresses in those
| fields - if you do, it's more likely due to a bug in your MTA.

I already planned to leave Bcc: out; Apparently-To:, though, might deserve
consideration, in case there are both an Apparently-To: and a Cc:.

Oh, wait, no, it doesn't, because I have Apparently-To: handled in an
earlier recipe.

| So, we're going to use about 2 billion machine cycles to figure out how to
| strip 200 cycles from each of the next 10 million messages you receive
| (those which actually reach that point in your rules at least).  <g>

Don't discount the educational value of this discussion.


_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>