"David W. Tamkin" <dattier(_at_)ripco(_dot_)com> writes:
...
Wouldn't it make more sense to split the mbox, run the first part for
duplicates, and then reuse the first part's cache to run the second part for
duplicates? That should take care of any message that appears in both parts
after the split.
Yes. That would be better.
Philip Guenther
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail