Procmail (date)
February 28, 2002
- IFS and using elm and procmail filtering, Deb, 12:35
- Why doesn't this work here?, PNEWS.ORG, 12:28
- Why doesn't this work here?, PNEWS.ORG, 12:25
- Multiple Users with one login, chris, 12:10
- Re: A more general X-Envelope-To, Professional Software Engineering, 10:14
- spliting up old sent-mail, postponed-msg, trash + others mail folders into separate exim-readable msg ??, Frederic Trudeau, 08:24
- Re: A more general X-Envelope-To, Aaron Schrab, 03:11
- Re:A more general X-Envelope-To, Fredrik Björk, 01:38
- Re:A more general X-Envelope-To, Fredrik Björk, 01:00
- Re: HOST issue again, Philip Guenther, 00:29
February 27, 2002
- Re: Newbie: Can't get procmail to run from .forward, Jeremy Wadsack, 18:17
- Re: Newbie: Can't get procmail to run from .forward, Professional Software Engineering, 17:51
- Re: Newbie: Can't get procmail to run from .forward, Bart Schaefer, 15:46
- Re: Newbie: Can't get procmail to run from .forward, Jeremy Wadsack, 15:35
- DEFAULT=? when using cyrus-imapd, Manuel Hendel, 15:28
- Re: problems with receipe - I always get Non-zero exitcode (1) from " test -f $BLACKLIST && $FORMAIL -zxFrom: -zxReply-To: | egrep -i -f $BLACKLIST", Philip Guenther, 14:17
- Re: Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, Professional Software Engineering, 13:24
- Re:A more general X-Envelope-To, Professional Software Engineering, 13:22
- Re: Newbie: Can't get procmail to run from .forward, Professional Software Engineering, 13:14
- Newbie: Can't get procmail to run from .forward, Jeremy Wadsack, 11:04
- Re:A more general X-Envelope-To, Charlie Summers, 10:54
- A more general X-Envelope-To, Fredrik Björk, 10:03
- Re: Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, Gilles N, 08:04
- Re: header-problem with /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver, Manuel Hendel, 02:44
- Re: Sophos interaction with procmail, Dave Ewart, 02:43
- Re: problems with receipe - I always get Non-zero exitcode (1) from " test -f $BLACKLIST && $FORMAIL -zxFrom: -zxReply-To: | egrep -i -f $BLACKLIST", Manuel Hendel, 02:09
- Re: problems with receipe - I always get Non-zero exitcode (1) from " test -f $BLACKLIST && $FORMAIL -zxFrom: -zxReply-To: | egrep -i -f $BLACKLIST", Philip Guenther, 01:53
- problems with receipe - I always get Non-zero exitcode (1) from " test -f $BLACKLIST && $FORMAIL -zxFrom: -zxReply-To: | egrep -i -f $BLACKLIST", Manuel Hendel, 01:44
February 26, 2002
- Re: Looping problem, Fred Morris, 22:06
- Re: Looping problem, Professional Software Engineering, 21:34
- Re: Looping problem, David W. Tamkin, 20:52
- Re: Looping problem, Fred Morris, 17:59
- Re: re-delivering mail, Rejo Zenger, 17:05
- Re: Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, Holger Wahlen, 15:56
- Re: Looping problem, peter, 13:59
- Re: Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, Trevor Jenkins, 13:57
- Re: Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, Professional Software Engineering, 13:02
- Re: Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:59
- Re: Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:56
- Re: procmail repeating messages, Professional Software Engineering, 12:52
- Sophos interaction with procmail, Stewart Dean, 12:50
- Re: Looping problem, Professional Software Engineering, 12:49
- Re: Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, mysiarld, 11:32
- Re: Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, mysiarld, 11:26
- Re: Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, Bart Schaefer, 11:23
- FW: procmail repeating messages FIXED, Mike Loiterman, 11:17
- RE: procmail repeating messages FIXED!, Mike Loiterman, 11:13
- Re: Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, Trevor Jenkins, 11:12
- Re: Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, mysiarld, 09:27
- Re: Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, Trevor Jenkins, 09:18
- Re: Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, mysiarld, 08:58
- Where should I put the .procmailrc file?, Gilles N, 08:50
- procmail and cyrus-imapd - Non-zero exitcode (65) ???, Manuel Hendel, 08:39
- Re: Looping problem, peter, 07:49
- Re: procmail repeating messages, Philip Guenther, 06:06
- RE: procmail repeating messages, General P. Fault, 02:47
- RE: procmail repeating messages, General P. Fault, 02:40
- RE: procmail repeating messages, Mike Loiterman, 02:32
- RE: procmail repeating messages, Mike Loiterman, 02:23
- Re: procmail repeating messages, Professional Software Engineering, 02:00
- Re: procmail repeating messages, Philip Guenther, 01:47
- procmail repeating messages, Mike Loiterman, 01:07
February 25, 2002
- Re: re-delivering mail, Philip Guenther, 19:18
- Re: re-delivering mail, Agustin Rivera, 18:37
- re-delivering mail, Jerry O'Brien, 18:26
- Re: looping problem, Professional Software Engineering, 10:28
- Re: looping problem, Don Hammond, 10:18
- Re: looping problem, Fred Morris, 09:50
- looping problem, peter, 09:34
- Re: procmailrc problem, David W. Tamkin, 00:28
- Re: procmailrc problem, Professional Software Engineering, 00:28
February 22, 2002
- Re: Trolling spamtrap addresses to use for spam filtering, Michael J Wise, 22:30
- Re: Trolling spamtrap addresses to use for spam filtering, David W. Tamkin, 08:57
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h, 08:18
- sco openserver binary, peter, 08:15
February 21, 2002
- Trolling spamtrap addresses to use for spam filtering, David Roll, 23:32
- Re: Mail filtered to two mailboxes, Matt Pounsett, 20:54
- Re: Mail filtered to two mailboxes, Professional Software Engineering, 20:09
- Re: Mail filtered to two mailboxes, Tim Holmes, 18:19
- Re: Mail filtered to two mailboxes, Professional Software Engineering, 17:43
- Mail filtered to two mailboxes, Tim Holmes, 16:29
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin, 15:38
February 20, 2002
- Re: Why this filter didn't work....., Professional Software Engineering, 16:01
- Re: Why this filter didn't work....., SMORRIS, 15:00
- Re: Rule for matching mails from my organization, Professional Software Engineering, 13:48
- Re: filtering by IP address, Professional Software Engineering, 13:48
- Re: Why this filter didn't work....., Professional Software Engineering, 13:46
- Why this filter didn't work....., SMORRIS, 12:56
- Re: Rule for matching mails from my organization, Agustin Rivera, 10:25
- RE: Rule for matching mails from my organization, Udi Mottelo, 10:06
- Re: Rule for matching mails from my organization, David W. Tamkin, 10:04
- Re: filtering by IP address, Pollywog, 10:03
- RE: Rule for matching mails from my organization, Kevin Ring, 09:42
- Re: Rule for matching mails from my organization, Udi Mottelo, 08:02
- Rule for matching mails from my organization, Kevin Ring, 06:29
- Re: filtering by IP address, James Tsay, 04:52
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h, 04:24
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, erik, 02:35
- Re: filtering by IP address, Nelson Henry Eric, 00:55
February 19, 2002
- best way to express a{3,7}, David W. Tamkin, 22:00
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Philip Guenther, 21:39
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin, 20:20
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin, 20:07
- Re: New Subscriber, Professional Software Engineering, 18:15
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h, 16:47
- New Subscriber, Scott Miller, 16:46
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Don Hammond, 15:54
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Bart Schaefer, 15:51
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin, 15:31
- HOST issue again, Matt Garretson, 14:26
- Re: Is it possible?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:01
- Is it possible?, Bill Sechrist, 07:49
- no subject, Bill Sechrist, 07:45
- no subject, Bill Sechrist, 07:44
- Fwd: Re: Problems matching attachment and autoreplying., Niklas Palmqvist, 01:17
- Re: (no subject), David W. Tamkin, 01:15
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, erik, 00:37
- (no subject), Jorge Gil Silva, 00:36
February 18, 2002
- Overriding system mailbox, Olivier Glassey, 19:26
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, David W. Tamkin, 17:39
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, David W. Tamkin, 17:36
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, Jacques L'helgoualc'h, 15:52
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, Jacques L'helgoualc'h, 15:52
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, General P. Fault, 15:49
- Re: yet another newbie question, Professional Software Engineering, 15:44
- Re: yet another newbie question, parv, 14:55
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, parv, 14:38
- Re: yet another newbie question, Charles Tassell, 13:40
- Re: yet another newbie question, Professional Software Engineering, 13:16
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, David W. Tamkin, 12:50
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, General P. Fault, 12:43
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, Jacques L'helgoualc'h, 11:32
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, David W. Tamkin, 10:55
- filtering by IP address, Pollywog, 10:55
- yet another newbie question, Peter Petto, 09:03
- Re: Problems matching attachment and autoreplying., Niklas Palmqvist, 04:49
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, General P. Fault, 04:44
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, General P. Fault, 03:14
- Re: Procmail version confusion, Santiago Vila, 03:12
- Procmail version confusion, Tim Allen, 02:00
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, Matt of the Long Red Hair, 01:01
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, Matt of the Long Red Hair, 00:58
- Re: newbie question re: huge procmail log file, Michael J Wise, 00:46
February 17, 2002
- Returned mail - Postfix/procmail can't create user output file, Greg Hodgins, 23:59
- Multi-line matches + backtick shell escapes, JulioB, 23:57
- Message being delivered as root, Charles Tassell, 23:53
- newbie question re: huge procmail log file, LorienElf, 23:52
- Re: Message being delivered as root, Philip Guenther, 22:52
- Message being delivered as root, Charles Tassell, 22:17
- Re: Newbie - Procmail and Qmail on Relay/Gateway setup ?, Professional Software Engineering, 21:33
- Newbie - Procmail and Qmail on Relay/Gateway setup ?, dennis, 20:21
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin, 16:53
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Philip Guenther, 16:21
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin, 15:39
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Philip Guenther, 13:35
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin, 12:30
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h, 11:56
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin, 11:49
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Professional Software Engineering, 11:32
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin, 10:06
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Bart Schaefer, 09:59
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin, 07:51
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h, 05:23
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Udi Mottelo, 03:56
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h, 03:52
February 16, 2002
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h, 18:25
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin, 17:25
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Professional Software Engineering, 16:43
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin, 13:47
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Professional Software Engineering, 12:38
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin, 12:16
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Bart Schaefer, 11:01
February 15, 2002
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin, 22:57
- Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Michael J Wise, 22:27
- Re: Problems matching attachment and autoreplying., Jacques L'helgoualc'h, 16:33
- Re: Procmail Problems, Philip Guenther, 15:39
- Re: Procmail Problems, Michael J Wise, 15:03
- Re: Problems matching attachment and autoreplying., David W. Tamkin, 14:55
- Re: Problems matching attachment and autoreplying., Jacques L'helgoualc'h, 14:38
- Re: procmail regex, Professional Software Engineering, 14:29
- Procmail Problems, Trevor Daucsavage, 14:28
- Re: procmail regex, Ruben I Safir, 13:27
- Re: Very basic Qn: How to reprocess Maildir with procmail, David W. Tamkin, 13:16
- Re: Problems matching attachment and autoreplying., Philip Guenther, 12:54
- Re: Very basic Qn: How to reprocess Maildir with procmail, Matt of the Long Red Hair, 12:46
- Re: Problems matching attachment and autoreplying., Matt of the Long Red Hair, 12:38
- Re: Very basic Qn: How to reprocess Maildir with procmail, David W. Tamkin, 12:33
- Re: procmail regex, David W. Tamkin, 12:22
- Re: procmail regex, Lars Hecking, 11:44
- Re: Very basic Qn: How to reprocess Maildir with procmail, Professional Software Engineering, 11:32
- Re: procmail regex, Professional Software Engineering, 11:27
- Re: procmail regex, Michael J Wise, 11:24
- Re: procmail regex, Ruben I Safir, 11:07
- Re: procmail regex, Ruben I Safir, 11:03
- Re: procmail regex, Lars Hecking, 10:44
- procmail regex, Ruben I Safir, 10:35
- Very basic Qn: How to reprocess Maildir with procmail, Edward Wildgoose, 10:32
- Re: artificial bounce?, Paul Chvostek, 09:56
- Re: Hopefully simple question, and is this a good idea?, Paul Chvostek, 09:37
- Re: Using personal .procmailrc over global .procmailrc, Louis-David Mitterrand, 09:17
- Re: question on procmail filters, SMORRIS, 09:12
- Re: Hopefully simple question, and is this a good idea?, SMORRIS, 08:17
- Problems matching attachment and autoreplying., Niklas Palmqvist, 08:13
- Re: Using personal .procmailrc over global .procmailrc, David W. Tamkin, 07:32
- Re: artificial bounce?, frbn, 04:05
- artificial bounce?, Paweł Krawczyk, 03:50
- RE: Slightly OT: How to let users change settings without logging in, Edward Wildgoose, 03:40
- Re: Using personal .procmailrc over global .procmailrc, Louis-David Mitterrand, 03:37
- Re: several recipes write to same folder, Bob Holtzman, 00:18
- Re: question on procmail filters, Professional Software Engineering, 00:07
February 14, 2002
- question on procmail filters, Kris Austin-Murray, 23:44
- Re: Performance Considerations of a Global procmailrc, Philip Guenther, 18:38
- Re: Performance Considerations of a Global procmailrc, Michael J Wise, 18:26
- Re: Performance Considerations of a Global procmailrc, Michael J Wise, 17:56
- Re: [Q] Trying to improve procmailrc by /bin/true, Philip Guenther, 15:34
- Re: Can procmail save an autoreply to an mbox file, and let me send it later?, Philip Guenther, 15:24
- Re: Procmail Logging -- Making it start new line.., David W. Tamkin, 14:55
- Can procmail save an autoreply to an mbox file, and let me send it later?, Stephen Patterson, 12:27
- Re: Procmail Logging -- Making it start new line.., Professional Software Engineering, 12:23
- Re:Procmail Logging -- Making it start new line.., Charlie Summers, 12:20
- Re: Hopefully simple question, and is this a good idea?, Michael J Wise, 12:05
- Re: Procmail Logging -- Making it start new line.., Michael J Wise, 11:44
- Procmail Logging -- Making it start new line.., Scott Palmer, 11:40
- Re: [Q] Trying to improve procmailrc by /bin/true, Professional Software Engineering, 11:25
- Re: Hopefully simple question, and is this a good idea?, Professional Software Engineering, 11:19
- Re: Slightly OT: How to let users change settings without logging in, Professional Software Engineering, 11:14
- Re: Slightly OT: How to let users change settings without logging in, Fred Morris, 11:05
- Re: Hopefully simple question, and is this a good idea?, Matt of the Long Red Hair, 11:00
- Re: Slightly OT: How to let users change settings without logging in, Matt of the Long Red Hair, 10:58
- Re: Using personal .procmailrc over global .procmailrc, David W. Tamkin, 09:33
- spamrc.txt, Paweł Krawczyk, 08:33
- Hopefully simple question, and is this a good idea?, SMORRIS, 08:12
- Slightly OT: How to let users change settings without logging in, Edward Wildgoose, 07:14
- Re: [Q] Trying to improve procmailrc by /bin/true, Udi Mottelo, 04:35
- Re: [Q] Trying to improve procmailrc by /bin/true, Udi Mottelo, 01:03
- Re: Mailbox Quotas, Michael J Wise, 00:06
- Re: Matching Special Characters, Philip Guenther, 00:03
February 13, 2002
- Re: Mailbox Quotas, Michael J Wise, 23:50
- Re: Matching Special Characters, Michael J Wise, 23:46
- Mailbox Quotas, RiverNet Support, 23:39
- Re: Matching Special Characters, Philip Guenther, 23:30
- Matching Special Characters, Michael J Wise, 22:57
- Re: Performance Considerations of a Global procmailrc, Michael J Wise, 22:33
- Re: Performance Considerations of a Global procmailrc, Philip Guenther, 22:18
- Re: Using personal .procmailrc over global .procmailrc, Philip Guenther, 22:07
- Re: Using personal .procmailrc over global .procmailrc, Philip Guenther, 21:57
- Re: Using personal .procmailrc over global .procmailrc, Michael J Wise, 21:49
- Re: Performance Considerations of a Global procmailrc, Michael J Wise, 21:27
- Re: Using personal .procmailrc over global .procmailrc, David W. Tamkin, 21:15
- Re: Performance Considerations of a Global procmailrc, Philip Guenther, 20:48
- Re: [Q] Trying to improve procmailrc by /bin/true, Philip Guenther, 20:04
- Re: [Q] Trying to improve procmailrc by /bin/true, Professional Software Engineering, 19:48
- Re: Blacklists, Michael J Wise, 19:31
- Performance Considerations of a Global procmailrc, Michael J Wise, 19:12
- Re: Blacklists, Nelson Henry Eric, 18:46
- [Q] Trying to improve procmailrc by /bin/true, Udi Mottelo, 18:18
- Blacklists, Agustin Rivera, 15:49
- Re: Catching empty sender address, General P. Fault, 15:31
- Re: Catching empty sender address, Professional Software Engineering, 14:49
- RE: how to keep mail from being stored, Professional Software Engineering, 14:47
- Re: Using personal .procmailrc over global .procmailrc, Professional Software Engineering, 14:44
- Re: Removing list identification from subject, Don Hammond, 14:27
- Re: Using personal .procmailrc over global .procmailrc, Pollywog, 14:13
- Mailbox Quotas, Terry Mac Millan, 14:02
- Using personal .procmailrc over global .procmailrc, Peter White, 13:57
- Re: Double posts, Stephen Patterson, 13:04
- Re: Catching empty sender address, General P. Fault, 10:50
- Re: Catching empty sender address, Bart Schaefer, 09:24
- On subject tags, was: Removing list identification from subject, Marco Fioretti, 09:03
- Re: Removing list identification from subject, Don Hammond, 08:42
- Re: Catching empty sender address, General P. Fault, 06:36
- RE: how to keep mail from being stored, Jerry A. Shenk, 05:33
- combining an external list in a regular expression, possible?, Nelson Henry Eric, 04:50
- Removing list identification from subject, José Romildo Malaquias, 04:36
- RE: Removing/blocking spam, Edward Wildgoose, 04:17
- Re: how to keep mail from being stored, Philip Guenther, 02:13
- Re: mail directories, Philip Guenther, 02:08
- Re: how to keep mail from being stored, Professional Software Engineering, 01:55
- Re: mail directories, Professional Software Engineering, 01:49
- how to keep mail from being stored, Jerry A. Shenk, 00:57
- mail directories, Niko Hiebaum, 00:53
February 12, 2002
- Re: several recipes write to same folder, Philip Guenther, 22:36
- Re: several recipes write to same folder, Bob Holtzman, 22:06
- Re: Catching empty sender address, Philip Guenther, 21:52
- Re: Issues with formail autoresponder and Sendmail 8.12.2.., Philip Guenther, 21:47
- Re: Issues with formail autoresponder and Sendmail 8.12.2.., Professional Software Engineering, 21:17
- Catching empty sender address, General P. Fault, 20:25
- Issues with formail autoresponder and Sendmail 8.12.2.., Howard Leadmon, 19:58
- Re: regexp to match x BEFORE y, Don Hammond, 15:08
- Re: Double posts, Professional Software Engineering, 14:56
- regexp to match x BEFORE y, J-Dog, 14:32
- Re: procmail and tcp, Pete O'Hara, 13:31
- Double posts, Mark, 13:29
- Re: Removing/blocking spam, Professional Software Engineering, 13:01
- Removing/blocking spam, Edward Wildgoose, 10:16
- RE: spamrc.txt file not working, Don Hammond, 10:14
- RE: Passing mail through a filter...$$$...Help!!, George Warnagiris, 10:00
- Re: Log Settings for a filter, Don Hammond, 09:49
- Re: Log Settings for a filter, Professional Software Engineering, 09:43
- RE: spamrc.txt file not working, Professional Software Engineering, 09:40
- Re: using a blacklist file to stop some spam, Don Hammond, 09:14
- Log Settings for a filter, Tim Holmes, 08:29
- Re: procmail and tcp, Udi Mottelo, 06:16
- Re: using a blacklist file to stop some spam, General P. Fault, 05:22
- RE: spamrc.txt file not working, Edward Wildgoose, 05:20
- using a blacklist file to stop some spam, Manuel Hendel, 05:11
- Re: reprocess file in /var/mail, Lars Hecking, 04:04
- Re: help with procmailrc, Philip Guenther, 01:21
- Re: Need help building procmail 3.22, erik, 01:15
- Re: several recipes write to same folder, Philip Guenther, 01:02
February 11, 2002
- several recipes write to same folder, Bob Holtzman, 23:33
- Passing mail through a filter...$$$...Help!!, mcgee5, 23:31
- help with procmailrc, Fernando Corte-Real Mira da Silva, 23:29
- Need help building procmail 3.22, Gopal, Sanil (CTR), 23:27
- Re: procmail and tcp, David W. Tamkin, 22:36
- Re: procmail and tcp, Philip Guenther, 22:34
- procmail and tcp, Pete O'Hara, 18:40
- RE: spamrc.txt file not working, Don Hammond, 18:02
- Re: spamrc.txt file not working, Professional Software Engineering, 14:58
- RE: spamrc.txt file not working, Tom Warfield, 14:23
- Re: spamrc.txt file not working, Don Hammond, 13:31
- Re: reprocess file in /var/mail, Philip Guenther, 11:34
- Re: (newbie)sendmail->procmail->uucp, Udi Mottelo, 11:17
- spamrc.txt file not working, Tom Warfield, 11:09
- reprocess file in /var/mail, Paul R. Morin, 08:44
- Re: [Esd-l] Perhaps it's possible to protect against this bug?, John D. Hardin, 08:25
- Re: (newbie)sendmail->procmail->uucp, Udi Mottelo, 06:02
- Re: (newbie)sendmail->procmail->uucp, josh, 05:26
- Re: (newbie)sendmail->procmail->uucp, Professional Software Engineering, 04:48
- Re: Monthly cleanup/archiving?, Udi Mottelo, 04:41
- (newbie)sendmail->procmail->uucp, josh, 04:25
- Re: Cannot get recipes to work properly, Nancy McGough, 02:29
February 10, 2002
- Monthly cleanup/archiving?, Tim Hogan, 20:29
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Landy Roman, 18:12
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Professional Software Engineering, 16:58
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Professional Software Engineering, 16:58
- Re: Cannot get recipes to work properly, Rich Shepard, 16:24
- Re: Cannot get recipes to work properly, David W. Tamkin, 16:05
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Udi Mottelo, 15:44
- Re: Cannot get recipes to work properly, Rich Shepard, 15:19
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Rich Shepard, 14:55
- Re: Cannot get recipes to work properly, Fred Morris, 14:50
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Udi Mottelo, 14:37
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Landy Roman, 14:31
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Philip Guenther, 14:31
- Re: Cannot get recipes to work properly, David W. Tamkin, 14:28
- Re: Cannot get recipes to work properly, David W. Tamkin, 14:27
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Andrew Edelstein, 14:23
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Rich Shepard, 14:21
- Where do I find the FAQ, Benji Durden, 14:20
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Andrew Edelstein, 14:11
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Landy Roman, 14:11
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Rich Shepard, 14:04
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Rich Shepard, 13:56
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Rich Shepard, 13:44
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Rich Shepard, 13:44
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, David W. Tamkin, 13:38
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Don Hammond, 13:31
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Rich Shepard, 13:29
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Professional Software Engineering, 13:27
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Professional Software Engineering, 13:26
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Rich Shepard, 13:24
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Udi Mottelo, 13:16
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Udi Mottelo, 13:07
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Rich Shepard, 13:06
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Rich Shepard, 13:02
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Landy Roman, 12:59
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Philip Guenther, 12:56
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Rich Shepard, 12:45
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Rich Shepard, 12:35
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Landy Roman, 12:34
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, Philip Guenther, 12:32
- Re: Cannot get recipies to work properly, David W. Tamkin, 12:30
- Cannot get recipies to work properly, Rich Shepard, 12:06
- Re: Leaving a copy of outgoing mails, Matt Rowley, 11:13
- Re: Leaving a copy of outgoing mails, dan radom, 10:25
- Leaving a copy of outgoing mails, Cesar Suito, 10:01
February 09, 2002
- Re: Removing extraneous Microsoft Outlook email headers, John D. Hardin, 20:19
- Re: [NEWBIE] "New mail is arrived... " message, Korhan GURLER, 12:35
- Re: [NEWBIE] "New mail is arrived... " message, Philip Guenther, 10:07
- [NEWBIE] "New mail is arrived... " message, Onofrio Panzarino, 09:50
- Re: Help for a newbie-ish, Philip Guenther, 00:44
February 08, 2002
- Re: Need help building procmail 3.22, Lars Hecking, 15:43
- Re: Need help building procmail 3.22, Philip Guenther, 15:01
- Need help building procmail 3.22, Gopal, Sanil (CTR), 14:48
- Help for a newbie-ish, Walter H. Hopgood, 12:07
- Re: default delivery (was Mail Dirs), David W. Tamkin, 09:41
- Re: Rejecting mail to sender, Professional Software Engineering, 09:33
- Rejecting mail to sender, PNEWS.ORG, 07:02
- Re: Mail Dirs, Philip Guenther, 00:47
February 07, 2002
- Re: sciprts: anti-mime, anti-attachments, anti-virus, Timothy J. Luoma, 23:19
- sciprts: anti-mime, anti-attachments, anti-virus, Timothy J. Luoma, 22:30
- Procmail based thread watch - A review for gotchas please, Harry Putnam, 20:29
- Re: "Suspicious rcfile" with virutal domains, Matt of the Long Red Hair, 13:31
- Re: Bounced sumbissions to the Procmail list, Don Hammond, 13:22
- Bounced sumbissions to the Procmail list (was: somthing totally unrelated), Professional Software Engineering, 12:22
- Re: [Q]: Option "-d" dosen't work in procmail, Philip Guenther, 12:14
- Re: Procmail development (Was: is this procmail rant justified?), Don Hammond, 11:34
- [Q]: Option "-d" dosen't work in procmail, Udi Mottelo, 11:01
- Re: Procmail development (Was: is this procmail rant justified?), Lars Hecking, 10:45
- Re: Procmail development (Was: is this procmail rant justified?), Professional Software Engineering, 10:27
- Re: "Suspicious rcfile" with virutal domains, Paul Chvostek, 03:42
- Re: Procmail development (Was: is this procmail rant justified?), Nelson Henry Eric, 03:32
- "Suspicious rcfile" with virutal domains, Matt of the Long Red Hair, 02:13
February 06, 2002
- Re: Adding a subject line, David W. Tamkin, 23:03
- Re: Adding a subject line, Professional Software Engineering, 21:32
- Adding a subject line, Chuck Charlton, 21:13
- Re: Procmail development (Was: is this procmail rant justified?), Professional Software Engineering, 19:46
- Re: Procmail development (Was: is this procmail rant justified?), General P. Fault, 18:39
- Re: Procmail development (Was: is this procmail rant justified?), Professional Software Engineering, 17:43
- Re: Procmail development (Was: is this procmail rant justified?), Nelson Henry Eric, 17:23
- RE: Mail Dirs, Trevor Daucsavage, 15:48
- Re: procmail: Extraneous locallockfile ignored, Professional Software Engineering, 15:08
- Re: Mail Dirs, Professional Software Engineering, 15:08
- Re: procmail: Extraneous locallockfile ignored, Tim Holmes, 14:03
- Re: Mail Dirs, Nancy McGough, 13:57
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Nick Wilson, 13:29
- Mail Dirs, Trevor Daucsavage, 13:06
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Professional Software Engineering, 12:09
- Re: procmail: Extraneous locallockfile ignored, Professional Software Engineering, 12:04
- Re: procmail: Extraneous locallockfile ignored, David W. Tamkin, 11:48
- procmail: Extraneous locallockfile ignored, Tim Holmes, 11:11
- Re: Procmail development (Was: is this procmail rant justified?), Stan Ryckman, 10:19
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Matt Dunford, 02:56
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Nick Wilson, 00:52
February 05, 2002
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Lars Kellogg-Stedman, 15:27
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Charlie Summers, 15:23
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Professional Software Engineering, 15:06
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Lars Kellogg-Stedman, 14:54
- Re: Using 'formail' with HTML, James Stevenson, 13:48
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Professional Software Engineering, 13:00
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Charlie Summers, 12:32
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Shane Williams, 12:06
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Dave Robbins, 12:01
- Re: Using 'formail' with HTML, Paul Chvostek, 11:48
- Re: Using 'formail' with HTML, Professional Software Engineering, 10:10
- Re: Removing extraneous Microsoft Outlook email headers, Xiaoyan Ma, 09:55
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Charlie Summers, 09:53
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Matt Dunford, 09:24
- Re: Removing extraneous Microsoft Outlook email headers, Matt Dunford, 09:18
- Re: A tool for refining regex, Harry Putnam, 07:03
- Re: Using 'formail' with HTML, Don Hammond, 06:26
- Re: Using 'formail' with HTML, frbn, 06:06
- Reposting: quota + procmail error message, George Chelidze, 04:13
- Re: Using 'formail' with HTML, Paul Chvostek, 04:09
- Using 'formail' with HTML, vestilla crafter, 02:27
- Re: A tool for refining regex, Harry Putnam, 00:34
February 04, 2002
- Re: interaction of A and e, Philip Guenther, 21:14
- Re: A tool for refining regex, Professional Software Engineering, 21:03
- Re: A tool for refining regex, Harry Putnam, 20:25
- Re: -a this -a that, David W. Tamkin, 15:20
- Re: -a this -a that (was lists.rc), Professional Software Engineering, 15:03
- -a this -a that (was lists.rc), David W. Tamkin, 14:41
- RE: lists.rc, Professional Software Engineering, 12:16
- Re: passing arguments as parameters to a script, Lars Kellogg-Stedman, 10:15
- Extracting attachments post date?, Poohba, 09:53
- passing arguments as parameters to a script, Tom Van de Wiele, 09:37
- RE: lists.rc, nimrod cohen, 01:40
February 03, 2002
- Re: Procmail and setrlimit(), Daniel J Peng, 23:45
- Re: interaction of A and e, David W. Tamkin, 19:37
- Re: interaction of A and e, Philip Guenther, 19:21
- interaction of A and e, David W. Tamkin, 14:52
- Re: lists.rc, Professional Software Engineering, 13:06
- Re: collection rule, Professional Software Engineering, 13:06
- Re: recreat mail, Professional Software Engineering, 13:05
- collection rule, nimrod cohen, 11:50
- recreat mail, nimrod cohen, 11:48
- lists.rc, nimrod cohen, 11:47
- RE: procmail and metamail, Udi Mottelo, 05:09
February 02, 2002
- Re: Catching this list's mail, parv, 18:19
- Re: Problem executing Procmail from .forward file, Philip Guenther, 17:03
- Re: Problem executing Procmail from .forward file, General P. Fault, 10:58
- Re: Problem executing Procmail from .forward file, General P. Fault, 10:43
- Removing extraneous Microsoft Outlook email headers, John Gianni, 07:45
- Problem executing Procmail from .forward file, Francis Stiff, 07:41
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Nick Wilson, 04:20
- Re: Catching this list's mail, Martin McCarthy, 04:04
- Catching this list's mail, Nick Wilson, 02:59
February 01, 2002
- Re: Converting message files to mbox, David W. Tamkin, 22:49
- Re: Converting message files to mbox, Professional Software Engineering, 22:32
- Re: Converting message files to mbox, Philip Guenther, 22:20
- Re: Converting message files to mbox, David W. Tamkin, 21:37
- Re: Procmail development (Was: is this procmail rant justified?), Philip Guenther, 21:19
- Re: Converting message files to mbox, Philip Guenther, 21:11
- Re: Converting message files to mbox, Kenneth Porter, 19:56
- Re: Converting message files to mbox, David W. Tamkin, 19:48
- Re: Converting message files to mbox, Professional Software Engineering, 18:56
- Converting message files to mbox, Kenneth Porter, 18:14
- Unsubscribe mailing list, Roy Barte, 18:11
- Configuring Procmail as a Sendmail rule-invoked mailer (info), Professional Software Engineering, 17:47
- Re: Does procmailrc affect mail in AND out of server?, Paul Thomas, 04:32
- Re: Does procmailrc affect mail in AND out of server?, Edward Bishop, 03:04
- Re: Does procmailrc affect mail in AND out of server?, Professional Software Engineering, 02:36
- Can't make Procmail on my personal folder, Trinity Technologies Ltd. - Reborn Support, 02:05
January 31, 2002
- Re: mailbox locking problem, Philip Guenther, 18:39
- Re: Does procmailrc affect mail in AND out of server?, Matt Rowley, 18:30
- Re: procmail as LDA on Sol7's Sendmail 8.9.3, Philip Guenther, 18:30
- procmail as LDA on Sol7's Sendmail 8.9.3, Dave Robbins, 18:05
- mailbox locking problem, GeneralP . Fault, 17:15
- Does procmailrc affect mail in AND out of server?, Edward Bishop, 17:13
- Re: formail segfault on sorting duplicates, Philip Guenther, 17:08
- Procmail development (Was: is this procmail rant justified?), Martin McCarthy, 17:07
- Re: exiting list - you sly dogs!, Professional Software Engineering, 16:48