Why would Kris not just be able to do this:
:0
* ^Subject:.*earn money
spam
|---------+----------------------------------->
| | PSE-L(_at_)mail(_dot_)professional(_dot_)|
| | org (Professional |
| | Software Engineering) |
| | Sent by: |
| | procmail-admin(_at_)Lists(_dot_)RWT|
| | H-Aachen.DE |
| | |
| | |
| | 02/15/2002 12:48 AM |
| | Please respond to |
| | procmail-users |
| | |
|---------+----------------------------------->
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: procmail-users(_at_)procmail(_dot_)org
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: question on procmail filters
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
At 16:41 2002-02-14 -0500, Kris Austin-Murray wrote:
i've tried every possible way to filter 'earn money' but it doesn't work.
You missed another one, using scoring:
:0:
* -1^0
* 1^0 ^Subject:.*earn
* 1^0 ^Subject:.*money
spam
here are a few recipes i've tested that failed:
You should enable VERBOSE logging and take a look at the logs generated.
:0
* ^Subject:.*\<earn\>.*
* ^Subject:.*\<money\>.*
spam
I doubt you have *TWO* subject lines.
:0
* ^Subject:.*earn.*
* ^Subject:.*money.*
spam
trailing wildcards are unnecessary.
:0
* ^Subject:.*earn.*money.*
spam
You should specify a lockfile flag. Lose the trailing wildcard. This rule
should work fine.
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <
http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail