Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D
2002-02-19 16:47:36
On 02/19/2002, 16:25 -0600, David W. Tamkin wrote:
[...]
Now if someone wants to propose a way to mix ANDs and ORs among the
conditions on a recipe that includes specification of grouping, I'm all
ears.
:0 [flags & co] # Head inchanged
( # sub-block begins...
* condition1.1
* condition1.2
# ...
)( # this sub-block is ORed with the first one
* condition2.1
# ...
) # sub-blocks chain ends here.
* condition3
action
Is this silly?
--
Jacques L'helgoualc'h
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, (continued)
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Udi Mottelo
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, erik
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Bart Schaefer
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Don Hammond
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Philip Guenther
- best way to express a{3,7}, David W. Tamkin
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D,
Jacques L'helgoualc'h <=
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, erik
|
|
|