Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D
2002-02-17 15:39:32
Philip wrote,
| It doesn't need to so obviously paired; you just need some way to turn
| it both on and off.
Your recommendations, all the same, were two markers that are obviously
paired. Obvious pairing may not be a necessity, but it wouldn't hurt.
| To me, the obvious choice is to follow perl's lead and use its
| (?magic-stuff-here)
| syntax. In particular, an embedded
| (?i)
| turns on case-insensitive matching till the next close-paren or the end
| of the regexp, while
| (?-i)
| turns it off for the same region.
Having no experience with perl -- I glanced at it years ago and just threw
up my hands, as too much was predicated on being familiar with C's syntax --
I had never heard of that. Looks good to me. It also, unlike anything
involving a backslash, doesn't need protection at the beginning of the
regexp. It would need some modifying because insensitivity is the default
[such as (?s) or (?c) to turn sensitivity on and then (?-s) or (?-c)
respectively to turn it off, unless those specific markers are already in
use in perl to mean something else], but that's all.
It also provides Sean's desired avenue of extensibility.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Professional Software Engineering
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Bart Schaefer
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Philip Guenther
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D,
David W. Tamkin <=
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Philip Guenther
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Professional Software Engineering
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Udi Mottelo
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, erik
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Philip Guenther |
Next by Date: |
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Philip Guenther |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Philip Guenther |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Philip Guenther |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|