Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D
2002-02-17 07:51:15
Jacques asked,
| Ahem, what about the procmailism $\Dsomething?
1. It is not backward compatible. A variable name can begin with D, and an
rcfile for the current code could be using $\DONKEY to mean "substitute the
value of $DONKEY but defuse all magic characters." That would make newer
procmail binaries read it as "substitute the value of $ONKEY (which may not
exist, especially if the user can't sing) but matches to that part of the
regexp must be case-sensitive."
2. It limits specifying local case-sensitivity only to the expansions of
variables. To do it on static text or on the expansions of command
substitutions, you'd need to save them in a variable first.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Michael J Wise
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Bart Schaefer
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Professional Software Engineering
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Professional Software Engineering
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D,
David W. Tamkin <=
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Bart Schaefer
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Philip Guenther
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Philip Guenther
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, David W. Tamkin
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h
- Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h |
Next by Date: |
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Bart Schaefer |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Jacques L'helgoualc'h |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Suggestion for Enhancement; B, H, ... and D, Bart Schaefer |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|