procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Q] Trying to improve procmailrc by /bin/true

2002-02-14 01:03:08
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Professional Software Engineering wrote:

Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:36:44 -0800
From: Professional Software Engineering 
<PSE-L(_at_)mail(_dot_)professional(_dot_)org>
Reply-To: procmail-users(_at_)procmail(_dot_)org
To: procmail-users(_at_)procmail(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [Q] Trying to improve procmailrc by /bin/true

At 03:14 2002-02-14 +0200, Udi Mottelo did say:

:0 fb
* sarit
| /bin/true

Uh, why are you using 'f' flag, and, well, if you want to ditch the message 
in a hurry, why use the 'b' flag, instead of say, the 'h' flag?


        I tried all the combination, just sent the last one.  You know,
        the problem is that procmail ignore the return status of the filter
        the other point are just cosmetic (:-)

Bye,
 Udi



:0h
* somecondition
/dev/null


---
  Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering

  Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
  Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies.  I'll get my copy from the list.

_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail



--


_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>