I've gotten these as responses to bounces before? Isn't it a violation to
bounce a bounce?
Eric
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, ProcMailER wrote:
I apologize to the list for the following and for the top post, but I
refuse to respond as indicated to Mr. Christopher. I did not send him
mail. The post in question was to the list.
I suggest that if he is unable to properly administer his email client
that he be dropped from the list.
Suggestions ??
------------------------------------------------------------
From: Christopher <ctp=ctpdesign(_dot_)com(_at_)spamarrest(_dot_)com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 03:18:23 -0000
Reply-To: Christopher <ctp(_at_)ctpdesign(_dot_)com>
To: pat(_at_)email(_dot_)is
Subject: RE: Re: help w/procmail recipe (verification)
X-Spamarrest-noauth: 1
X-Spamarrest-speedcode:
X-Hops: 1
Status: RO
Content-Length: 3404
Lines: 134
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Christopher here,
I'm protecting myself from receiving junk mail.
Just this once, click the link below so I can receive your emails.
You won't have to do this again.
http://spamarrest.com/a?80388200:273948
Spam Arrest - Take control of your inbox!
http://spamarrest.com
------------------------------------------------------------
You are receiving this message in response to your email to
ctp(_at_)ctpdesign(_dot_)com, a Spam Arrest customer.
Spam Arrest requests that senders verify themselves before
their email is delivered.
When you click the above link, you will be taken to a page
with a graphic on it. Simply read the word in the graphic,
type it into the form, and you're verified.
You will only need to do this once per Spam Arrest customer.
------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail