On 10 Dec 2002 dman(_at_)nomotek(_dot_)com (dman(_at_)nomotek(_dot_)com) wrote:
Nancy McGough <nm-this-address-is-valid(_at_)no(_dot_)sp(_dot_)am> wrote:
The next version of Pine (4.51)
has a new feature called
scramble-message-id
In short, and using language from legal analysis metaphorically,
Message-ID's that do not conform to the recommended syntax are
well overrepresented among spammers, and underrepresented among
legitimate correspondents. And I score the mail accordingly.
Thanks dman. I'm going to forward a copy of your message to the
Pine team -- hopefully they'll at least put a warning about
spam-detection tools in the Help on this feature.
If anyone has any insight into how prevalent this (no valid
domain name in a Message-ID) is in spam-detection tools, please
let me know.
Thanks,
Nancy
--
-- I N F I N I T E I N K www.ii.com N A N C Y M c G O U G H --
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail