On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 the voices made LuKreme write:
L> On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 11:05 AM, Daryle A. Tilroe wrote:
L> > Bump! So is no one out there using fractional scoring?
L>
L> Fractional scoring is most useful, it seems to me, when you are tyring
L> to deal with spam. I think it's silly to use procmail to deal with
L> spam issues beyond
L>
L> :0 fw
L> | spamc
L>
L> :0
L> * X-Spam-Level:.*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
L> /dev/null
No need to waste resources when you don't have to, so before hitting spamc you
should /dev/null all the e-mails with charsets that belong to languages you
don't understand (be careful, some do contain most of the basic latin-
characters as well as the "wierd" stuff; one of the two FPs I've had this year
was because I'd set KOI8-R as a "spam only" charset, thinking that it was
russian cyrillic characters only... oooops...).
And... you shouldn't /dev/null everything SA says is spam, there will be even
high scoring FPs.
--
/\___/\ /\___/\
\_@ @_/ \_@ @_/
+--oOO-(_)-OOo------------------------------------------oOO-(_)-OOo--+
| Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! |
+---ôôô---ôôô--------------------------------------------ôôô---ôôô---+
\O/ \O/ (c)1998-2003 tony(_at_)svanstrom(_dot_)com \O/ \O/
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail