On Saturday, Mar 29, 2003, at 15:44 Canada/Mountain, Dan Gahlinger
wrote:
Version? whatever is on the download link at procmail.org
Perms? default when creating any new file
Ownership? duhhh
Path validity? yes
MTA logs? none, until recently
MTA reactions? no messages, no delivery, as mentioned
You are basically saying "here's my problem, trust me that none of the
details I failed to provide are important." Expreience dictates that
the details ARE important. You can say "duh" and "Yes, the paths are
valid" but that's pretty much meaningless unless you provide full
details. "Yes they are valid" is not "full details"
% ls -l ~/.forward
<listing of the forward file>
% cat .forward
<contents of forward, including a path to procmail>
% ls -l <path to procmail>
<listing of procmail executable>
% procmail -v
< Output of procmail's version>
% cat .procmailrc
[contents of procamilrc, or COMPLETE UNALTERED recipe that is failing]
that's the sort of information you have to provide
Also, attacking one of the few people on this list who will be willing
and able to help with basically ANY procmail question is -- well,
rhymes with "moopid".
--
Sarah, age 18, says "man, once you go crayola you can't go back."
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail