On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
DG> I /am/ actually using condition lines, but since they *are* only header
DG> checks, the H is extraneous, correct.
You're about to learn why one shouldn't use only partly rewritten parts of
ones code/recipes, and if you don't feel like waiting for that to happen
there's always google...
What /are/ you talking about? H is for header checks, B is for body checks
. I'm only doing header checks. I don't need the H, and don't use the B.
What could possibly go wrong from:
:0Hhfw
* ^From: (_dot_)*bob(_at_)sentex\(_dot_)net
| $SED 's/bob(_at_)sentex\(_dot_)net/bob(_at_)sentex\(_dot_)ca/g'
To:
:0hfw
* ^From: (_dot_)*bob(_at_)sentex\net
| $SED 's/bob(_at_)sentex\(_dot_)net/bob(_at_)sentex\(_dot_)ca/g'
???
This is a rhetorical question. I find your response inane, and any further
responses I will take off-list. I don't want pointers to Google. And
apologies for formatting, once again I am not at my desk, and I have no
control over my mail client.
- Damian
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail