On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 the voices made Damian Gerow write:
DG> Thus spake Professional Software Engineering
(PSE-L(_at_)mail(_dot_)professional(_dot_)org) [10/07/03 18:47]:
DG> > 'H' isn't applicable here, on two counts:
DG> >
DG> > 1. You're not providing any condition lines, so it isn't
applicable
DG> > 2. It is the default - the only time you should need to provide
'H'
DG> > is in conjunction with 'B', because in the absense of H or
DG> > B, H defaults.
DG>
DG> I /am/ actually using condition lines, but since they *are* only header
DG> checks, the H is extraneous, correct.
You're about to learn why one shouldn't use only partly rewritten parts of
ones code/recipes, and if you don't feel like waiting for that to happen
there's always google...
=p
--
.-------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Per scientiam ad libertatem! (Through knowledge towards freedom!) |
`-------------------------------------------------------------------´
<< ©1998-2003 tony(_at_)svanstrom(_dot_)com >>
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail