Re: prevent unnecessary forking

On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 04:35:26PM +0200, Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:
> Is this:
>
>    :0c
>    * B ?? < 100000
>    {
>      #etc.
>    }
>
> less efficient than the following?
No, it's more.

>    :0
>    * B ?? < 100000
>    {
>      :0c
>      {
>        #etc.
>      }
>    }
>
> Rephrased: does the fork occur right at the c-flag, 
> or only after the condition is checked.
After the condition is checked.

-- 
dman

_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail