Re: * ! ? $TEST -d "$some_directory" may not work

I wrote,

> Didn't you notice that there's no "program failure" report in the
> verbose logfile?  [such as]

> procmail: Program failure (2) of "$TEST -d "$av_REQUIRED_DIR""

Oops ... in newer versions the text is "non-zero exit code" rather than
"program failure"; sorry about that.


_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: "$" modifier on "?" conditions, (continued) Re: "$" modifier on "?" conditions, David W. Tamkin Re: "$" modifier on "?" conditions, Robert Allerstorfer Re: "$" modifier on "?" conditions, David W. Tamkin Re: "$" modifier on "?" conditions, Robert Allerstorfer Re: "$" modifier on "?" conditions, Dallman Ross Re: "$" modifier on "?" conditions, David W. Tamkin * ! ? $TEST -d "$some_directory" may not work (was: Re: "$" modifier on "?" conditions), Robert Allerstorfer *Re: ! ? $TEST -d "$some_directory" may not work (was: Re: "$" modifier on "?" conditions)*, David W. Tamkin* *Re: ! ? $TEST -d "$some_directory" may not work*, Robert Allerstorfer* *Re: ! ? $TEST -d "$some_directory" may not work*, David W. Tamkin* *Re: ! ? $TEST -d "$some_directory" may not work*, David W. Tamkin* <= *Re: ! ? $TEST -d "$some_directory" may not work*, Dallman Ross* *Re: ! ? $TEST -d "$some_directory" may not work*, Robert Allerstorfer* *Re: ! ? $TEST -d "$some_directory" may not work*, David W. Tamkin* *Re: ! ? $TEST -d "$some_directory" may not work as expected*, Robert Allerstorfer* *Re: ! ? $TEST -d "$some_directory" may not work as expected*, David W. Tamkin* Re: base64-decoding (v.1.00) with 'just' procmail (enhanced), Ruud H.G. van Tol