On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 11:19:56AM -0500, Dan Smart wrote:
I'm running spamassassin under procmail. Please review my assumptions.
I call spamassassin as follows from my procmailrc
:0 fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
If spamc fails for some reason, (TIMEOUT, too many instances, etc?) then
procmail continues with the rest of the recipe.
What risk do I incur if I add the following?
:0 fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
:0 e ## If previous errors, run this
{
EXITCODE = $EX_TEMPFAIL
HOST = "_spamc_failed_"
}
I believe the answer is that it is platform-dependent, particularly
MTA-dependent. It might work fine on your system. I would test
it thoroughly. I would tend to think it wouldn't work under postfix
as the MTA, but I'm not certain.
--
dman
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail