Procmail (date)
August 31, 2004
- Re: Logical OR, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:22
- Re: Logical OR, DZ-Jay, 07:16
- Re: Filtering on ISO-8859-1 encoded Subject lines, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:16
- Re: Logical OR, S.A. Birl, 06:55
- Re: Logical OR, Udi Mottelo, 01:50
August 30, 2004
- Re: Is 3.15.2 vulnerable?, Sebastian Stein, 13:39
- Re: Is 3.15.2 vulnerable?, Google Kreme, 13:10
- Re: Recipe problem, Google Kreme, 12:55
- Filtering on ISO-8859-1 encoded Subject lines, J Britain, 12:54
- Re: Logical OR, DZ-Jay, 10:41
- Logical OR, S.A. Birl, 09:21
- Is 3.15.2 vulnerable?, Sebastian Stein, 09:14
- Re: Recipe problem, Bill McCormick, 06:36
August 29, 2004
- Re: Recipe problem, Google Kreme, 23:08
- Re: Matching unique mailing list identifier strings (was Re: Sorting several lists into a common folder -- with a nice pretty name (was Re: Recipe problem)), John Conover, 12:26
- Re: Matching unique mailing list identifier strings (was Re: Sorting several lists into a common folder -- with a nice pretty name (was Re: Recipe problem)), Bob George, 11:53
- Re: Why - > No match on "^To:.*${TO}", Dallman Ross, 11:45
- Re: Why - > No match on "^To:.*${TO}", Thomas Creutz, 10:57
- Re: Why - > No match on "^To:.*${TO}", Thomas Creutz, 10:55
- Re: Why - > No match on "^To:.*${TO}", Dallman Ross, 09:53
- Re: Matching unique mailing list identifier strings (was Re: Sorting several lists into a common folder -- with a nice pretty name (was Re: Recipe problem)), Dallman Ross, 09:48
- Re: Why - > No match on "^To:.*${TO}", Justin Gombos, 09:45
- Re: procmail mailping ( was Re: test), Bob George, 09:16
- Re: Matching unique mailing list identifier strings (was Re: Sorting several lists into a common folder -- with a nice pretty name (was Re: Recipe problem)), Bob George, 09:13
- Why - > No match on "^To:.*${TO}", Thomas Creutz, 09:11
- Re: procmail mailping ( was Re: test), Michelle Konzack, 07:25
- Re: test, Michelle Konzack, 07:09
- Re: Matching unique mailing list identifier strings (was Re: Sorting several lists into a common folder -- with a nice pretty name (was Re: Recipe problem)), Dallman Ross, 01:57
- Re: procmail mailping ( was Re: test), Udi Mottelo, 00:16
August 28, 2004
- Matching unique mailing list identifier strings (was Re: Sorting several lists into a common folder -- with a nice pretty name (was Re: Recipe problem)), Bob George, 21:56
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, Google Kreme, 15:20
- procmail mailping ( was Re: test), Bob George, 13:56
- Re: procmail log file corruption, Lloyd Lee-Lim, 13:03
- Re: test, antenneX, 12:35
- Re: Procmail and Courier IMAP (was: executing a program on match), NM Public, 11:07
- Re: executing a program on match, Bill McCormick, 10:52
- Re: test, Bob George, 10:19
- Re: Procmail and Courier IMAP (was: executing a program on match), Michelle Konzack, 09:53
- Re: Procmail and Courier IMAP, David W. Tamkin, 09:51
- Procmail and Courier IMAP (was: executing a program on match), Bill McCormick, 09:05
- Re: executing a program on match, Michelle Konzack, 09:02
- Re: executing a program on match, Michelle Konzack, 08:59
- Re: executing a program on match, Bill McCormick, 08:07
- Re: executing a program on match, David W. Tamkin, 07:36
- Re: executing a program on match, Bill McCormick, 07:24
- Re: executing a program on match, Bill McCormick, 07:17
- Re: executing a program on match, Michelle Konzack, 06:46
- executing a program on match, Bill McCormick, 06:33
- test, Bill McCormick, 04:39
- Re: Sorting several lists into a common folder -- with a nice pretty name (was Re: Recipe problem), Volker Kuhlmann, 03:31
- Re: Sorting several lists into a common folder -- with a nice pretty name, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 01:32
August 27, 2004
- Re: Recipe problem, Bob George, 23:56
- Re: Sorting several lists into a common folder -- with a nice pretty name (was Re: Recipe problem), Bob George, 23:45
- Re: Sorting several lists into a common folder -- with a nice pretty name (was Re: Recipe problem), Bob George, 23:42
- Re: Sorting several lists into a common folder -- with a nice pretty name (was Re: Recipe problem), Volker Kuhlmann, 15:07
- Re: Recipe problem, David W. Tamkin, 12:40
- Re: Recipe problem, Jason Rennie, 12:23
- RE: Exitcode=67 causes large accumulation double-bounced messages in inbox, John Schneider, 10:57
- Exitcode=67 causes large accumulation double-bounced messages in inbox, John Schneider, 10:55
- Re: Sorting several lists into a common folder -- with a nice pretty name (was Re: Recipe problem), Bob George, 08:31
- Re: Maildir create, Michelle Konzack, 07:32
- Re: Maildir create, Hans du Plooy, 07:21
- RE: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, Mike Peeler, 03:13
- Re: Sorting several lists into a common folder -- with a nice pretty name (was Re: Recipe problem), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:09
- Re: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, Mike Peeler, 01:30
August 26, 2004
- Sorting several lists into a common folder -- with a nice pretty name (was Re: Recipe problem), Bob George, 23:44
- Re: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, Eric Wood, 19:27
- Re: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, Mike Peeler, 13:51
- Re: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, Eric Wood, 13:29
- Re: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, Mike Peeler, 13:15
- Re: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, Dan Smart, 12:15
- Re: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, Dan Smart, 08:10
- Re: Recipe problem, Chuck Campbell, 07:22
- Re: Recipe problem, Bob George, 06:56
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, Bob George, 06:56
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, Dallman Ross, 02:08
- Re: Recipe problem, Dallman Ross, 02:00
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, Dallman Ross, 01:57
August 25, 2004
- Re: Recipe problem, Bob George, 21:54
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, Bob George, 21:44
- Re: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, Dan Smart, 14:01
- Re: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, Mike Peeler, 13:30
- Re: Recipe problem, William Park, 13:06
- Re: Recipe problem, Chuck Campbell, 12:45
- Re: Recipe problem, Chuck Campbell, 12:36
- Re: Recipe problem, Michelle Konzack, 12:27
- Re: Recipe problem, William Park, 12:19
- Re: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, Dan Smart, 12:06
- Recipe problem, Chuck Campbell, 11:38
- Re: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, David W. Tamkin, 10:58
- Re: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, Dan Smart, 10:32
- Re: Environment variables in conditions., Chris Johnson, 07:22
- Re: Environment variables in conditions., David W. Tamkin, 07:06
- Environment variables in conditions., Chris Johnson, 06:52
- Re: exactly once, Dallman Ross, 06:11
- Re: exactly once, David W. Tamkin, 05:59
- RE: exactly once, Dallman Ross, 02:49
August 24, 2004
- Re: procmail log file corruption, Lloyd Lee-Lim, 23:20
- Regular Expressions., multimedia-fan, 22:24
- Re: procmail log file corruption, Bart Schaefer, 22:23
- Re: exactly once, David W. Tamkin, 20:39
- Re: exactly once, Mike Peeler, 20:00
- Re: exactly once, David W. Tamkin, 19:24
- Re: exactly once, Mike Peeler, 18:51
- Re: exactly once, David W. Tamkin, 17:49
- Re: exactly once, David W. Tamkin, 17:39
- Re: exactly once, Mike Peeler, 17:25
- Re: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, Mike Peeler, 15:47
- Re: exactly once, David W. Tamkin, 15:30
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, Michelle Konzack, 15:25
- RE: exactly once, Dallman Ross, 15:17
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, David W. Tamkin, 13:16
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, Michael J Wise, 12:36
- Re: Should I tempfail when spamfiltering, Dallman Ross, 12:18
- Re: Do I need to set EXITCODE's?, Dallman Ross, 12:11
- Re: procmail log file corruption, Dallman Ross, 11:56
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, Chuck Campbell, 11:54
- Re: procmail log file corruption, Dallman Ross, 11:48
- Re: procmail log file corruption, Bart Schaefer, 11:37
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, David W. Tamkin, 11:35
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, Bart Schaefer, 11:32
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, Scot L. Harris, 11:16
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, David W. Tamkin, 10:41
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, Anthony R.Gold, 10:28
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, Chuck Campbell, 10:22
- Re: I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, Michael J Wise, 10:05
- I'm sure I'm brain dead, but I can't see the problem in this recipe, Chuck Campbell, 09:42
August 17, 2004
- Re: Filtering BCC, Gerald V. Livingston II, 18:04
- Re: Filtering BCC, Justin Gombos, 17:01
- Re: Filtering BCC, multimedia-fan, 14:49
- locking question, Peter Rosa, 10:08
- Re: Filtering BCC, Udi Mottelo, 08:52
- Filtering BCC, Pedro Gauna, 08:23
August 13, 2004
- Re: limiting number of procmail processes running, Michael J Wise, 17:30
- Re: limiting number of procmail processes running, David W. Tamkin, 17:08
- Re: limiting number of procmail processes running, Eric S. Johansson, 16:40
- if checking several strings in parens?, A.G. Russell IV, 14:46
- Re: limiting number of procmail processes running, Dallman Ross, 14:06
- Re: limiting number of procmail processes running, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 11:25
- Re: Is procmail dropping messages?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:29
- Re: limiting number of procmail processes running, Eric S. Johansson, 06:00
August 12, 2004
- Re: Service Down - sbl.spamhus.org, il_NO_tara_SPAM_ho, 21:36
- Service Down - sbl.spamhus.org, il_NO_tara_SPAM_ho, 20:47
- Re: limiting number of procmail processes running, David W. Tamkin, 19:38
- limiting number of procmail processes running, Eric S. Johansson, 19:26
- Updated Cygwin Package: procmail-3.22-9, Jason Tishler, 14:08
- Re: This tiny script causes a segmentation fault.., Joseph V Moss, 13:57
- RE: This tiny script causes a segmentation fault.., Dallman Ross, 03:36
August 11, 2004
- Re: This tiny script causes a segmentation fault.., Joseph V Moss, 19:44
- Re: Filtering Wierd Character Strings, Justin Gombos, 17:27
- Re: [OT] Reply to header, Justin Gombos, 17:02
- Re: Question, Google Kreme, 13:07
- Question, Michael Pratt, 11:21
- Re: question for a filter condition, David W. Tamkin, 07:17
- Re: question for a filter condition, Dallman Ross, 02:46
- Re: [OT] Reply to header, Google Kreme, 01:26
August 10, 2004
- question for a filter condition, Thomas Hendrich, 22:05
- Re: [OT] O[E], Professional Software Engineering, 19:30
- Re: [OT] O[E], Justin Gombos, 17:25
- Re: [OT] Reply to header, Justin Gombos, 17:04
- Problem with MailScanner, Pedro Gauna, 13:13
- Filtering Wierd Character Strings, Henry Ramos, 13:10
- Question about INBOX permissions, Stewart Dean, 08:41
- get notification for over quota, Rakeshman, 05:48
- get notification for over quota, Rakesh Man Karmacharya, 04:29
- Re: [OT] Reply to header, Dallman Ross, 02:49
- Re: Reply to header, Michelle Konzack, 02:20
August 09, 2004
- Re: Re: question about forwarding mail, Thomas Hendrich, 23:51
- Re: [OT] Reply to header, David W. Tamkin, 20:52
- Re: [OT] Reply to header, Justin Gombos, 18:36
- Re: question about forwarding mail, Google Kreme, 18:18
- Re: Procmail Filter, Google Kreme, 18:13
- Re: Reply to header, Jason Rennie, 16:36
- Re: Cleaning up the Subject: header (was Re: Reply to header), Patrick Shanahan, 16:25
- Re: classic procmail directories, Dallman Ross, 16:16
- Re: Cleaning up the Subject: header (was Re: Reply to header), Bob George, 16:06
- Re: classic procmail directories, David W. Tamkin, 15:24
- Re: Simple procmail filter rule, Dallman Ross, 14:53
- Re: Cleaning up the Subject: header (was Re: Reply to header), Patrick Shanahan, 14:01
- question about forwarding mail, Thomas Hendrich, 14:01
- Re: classic procmail directory (was ...X-priority in header), Dallman Ross, 13:45
- Cleaning up the Subject: header (was Re: Reply to header), Bob George, 13:35
- Re: Is procmail dropping messages?, Dallman Ross, 13:34
- Simple procmail filter rule, Christopher L. Barnard, 13:23
- Re: Procmail Filter, Pedro Gauna, 12:58
- Re: Procmail Filter, Pedro Gauna, 12:34
- Re: Reply to header, Michelle Konzack, 11:33
- Re: [OT] Reply to header, Bill McCormick, 10:53
- Re: Reply to header, Bill McCormick, 10:53
- Re: [OT] Reply to header, Scott Wiersdorf, 10:43
- Reply to header, Bill McCormick, 10:40
- Re: change X-priority in header, Google Kreme, 10:08
- Re: classic procmail directory (was ...X-priority in header), Darryl Waterhouse, 09:17
- Re: classic procmail directories, David W. Tamkin, 09:06
- Re: Procmail Filter, David W. Tamkin, 08:57
- Procmail Filter, Pedro Gauna, 08:37
- classic procmail directory (was ...X-priority in header), rgball, 08:22
- Re: change X-priority in header, Bill McCormick, 07:54
- Re: correction Re: change X-priority in header, Bill McCormick, 07:54
- correction Re: change X-priority in header, David W. Tamkin, 07:46
- Re: change X-priority in header, David W. Tamkin, 07:29
- Re: change X-priority in header, Bill McCormick, 06:59
- Re: change X-priority in header, Bill McCormick, 06:59
- Re: change X-priority in header, Bill McCormick, 06:59
- change X-priority in header, Bill McCormick, 06:19
- Re: auto list folders, Bill McCormick, 04:37
- Re: Is procmail dropping messages?, Volker Kuhlmann, 03:04
- Re: auto list folders, Google Kreme, 01:42
August 08, 2004
- Re: auto list folders, Nancy McGough, 22:45
- Re: Is procmail dropping messages?, Nancy McGough, 22:24
- auto list folders, Bill McCormick, 22:00
- Re: Is procmail dropping messages?, Volker Kuhlmann, 19:04
- Re: Is procmail dropping messages?, Justin Gombos, 18:26
- Re: Lockfiles are a lousy mechanism for write protection, Justin Gombos, 08:26
August 07, 2004
- Re: Is procmail dropping messages?, David W. Tamkin, 06:09
- Re: Lockfiles are a lousy mechanism for write protection, DZ-Jay, 03:44
- Re: Is procmail dropping messages?, Volker Kuhlmann, 02:07
- Re: Is procmail dropping messages?, Nancy McGough, 00:30
- Re: Is procmail dropping messages?, Justin Gombos, 00:20
August 06, 2004
- Re: Is procmail dropping messages?, Nancy McGough, 23:40
- Is procmail dropping messages?, Justin Gombos, 21:40
- Re: Lockfiles are a lousy mechanism for write protection, Justin Gombos, 16:59
- Re: Help with Postfix-Procmail-Cyrus, Google Kreme, 08:00
- Re: Lockfiles are a lousy mechanism for write protection, Google Kreme, 07:48
August 05, 2004
- Re: Lockfiles are a lousy mechanism for write protection, Gerald V. Livingston II, 20:53
- Re: Lockfiles are a lousy mechanism for write protection, Howard Siegel, 17:59
- Re: Lockfiles are a lousy mechanism for write protection, Justin Gombos, 17:45
- Re: Lockfiles are a lousy mechanism for write protection, Volker Kuhlmann, 15:14
- Help with Postfix-Procmail-Cyrus, Pedro Gauna, 13:05
- Re: Lockfiles are a lousy mechanism for write protection, R A Lichtensteiger, 11:44
- Re: ten years ago TODAY..., John Conover, 02:01
- Re: ten years ago TODAY..., Udi Mottelo, 00:20
August 04, 2004
- Re: Lockfiles are a lousy mechanism for write protection, Howard Siegel, 21:43
- Lockfiles are a lousy mechanism for write protection, Justin Gombos, 17:33
- Re: write to one file from numerous recipes, David W. Tamkin, 12:48
- Re: write to one file from numerous recipes, Harry Putnam, 11:24
- Re: write to one file from numerous recipes, Harry Putnam, 11:10
- Help with Postfix-Procmail-Cyrus, Pedro Gauna, 11:08
- Re: vars containing dirs problem, Andreas Faust, 06:50
- vars containing dirs problem, Andreas Faust, 06:27
- Re: funny match???, Volker Kuhlmann, 05:47
- ten years ago TODAY..., Nancy McGough, 01:34
- Re: funny match???, Nancy McGough, 01:03
- Re: funny match???, Volker Kuhlmann, 00:01
August 03, 2004
- Re: write to one file from numerous recipes, Michelle Konzack, 10:45
- Re: Procmail + Sieve, Michelle Konzack, 10:45
- Re: write to one file from numerous recipes, David W. Tamkin, 06:46
- Re: write to one file from numerous recipes, Harry Putnam, 05:39
- Re: write to one file from numerous recipes, Harry Putnam, 05:39
- Re: funny match???, Dallman Ross, 02:15
- funny match???, Volker Kuhlmann, 00:50
- Re: write to one file from numerous recipes, Google Kreme, 00:23
August 02, 2004
- Re: write to one file from numerous recipes, Harry Putnam, 19:37
- Re: write to one file from numerous recipes, Google Kreme, 16:59
- Re: write to one file from numerous recipes, Justin Gombos, 16:51
- write to one file from numerous recipes, Harry Putnam, 05:08
- Procmail + Sieve, Wodan, 01:06
August 01, 2004
- Re: Filtering this list - sed usage, Google Kreme, 17:30
- Re: Filtering this list - sed usage, Dallman Ross, 13:46
- Re: Filtering this list - sed usage, David W. Tamkin, 13:46
- Re: Filtering this list - sed usage, Justin Gombos, 13:25
- Re: does this recipe make sense, Obantec Support, 12:03
- Re: does this recipe make sense, Justin Gombos, 12:03
- Re: does this recipe make sense, R A Lichtensteiger, 10:27
- Re: does this recipe make sense, Justin Gombos, 08:56
- Re: does this recipe make sense, Michelle Konzack, 08:47
- does this recipe make sense, Obantec Support, 08:21