At 18:18 2004-08-10 -0600, Justin Gombos wrote:
* Dallman Ross <dman(_at_)nomotek(_dot_)com> [2004-08-10 16:09]:
>
> Well, first of all, most of the population does not use Outlook.
> Most of the population perhaps uses Outlook Express (if we take
In my biz, we refer to them as "the unwashed masses". <g>
> "most" to be the winning plurality). The two are entirely different
> programs.
For the sake of this discussion, they are the same program, simply
because neither one of them comes stock with a reply to list
function.
I've got to side with Dallman on this one - OE has shown to exhibit
different buggy behaviour than the full-blown Outlook. They both blow, but
differently.
Even so, the topic header seems rather appropriate - this is off topic for
procmail.
Of course not. But in this case, reply-to-list capability has been
withheld from O[E] from day one and still today.
Indeed. Outbreak users are the bane of my existance when they reply to the
listowner (the ENVELOPE sender address, but NOT the From: or unset
Reply-To:). Braindead. I've gotten over it - I just remind users that
they need to get a better email client because theirs is broken.
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail