Re: Matching unique mailing list identifier strings (was Re: Sorting sev

    # Unknown mailing list, (perhaps a new one that is not listed
    # above; mailing list headers as per RFC 2369 paragraph 3, and,
    # RFC 2919):
    #
    :0 E
    * ^((x-)?mailing-)?list(-(archive|help|id|name|owner|post|\
        (un)?subscribe))?:|(x-)?beenthere:





Bob George writes:
> Dallman Ross wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > I wasn't responding to that.  I was responding to your statement,
> > cut from your answer here, that you had yet to see a list you
> > belong to with X-Loop:, X-BeenThere:, etc.
> >  
> Ah, gotcha. I should have written "But none of these are NECESSARY on 
> any of my currently subscribed lists."  I'm assuming any RFC2919 are 
> authoritative (which they should be), so I give those headers top 
> ranking. I suppose X-BeenThere: is less ambiguous than 
> Precedence:+From:. X-Loop:, again, is likely to be seen in non-list 
> messages.
>
> I've found the list I posted through searches of archives and googling. 
> Has anybody found any other good "unique list identifying header" examples?
    #
    # Mailing list headers as per RFC 2369 paragraph 3, and, RFC 2919:
    #
    :0 
    * 
^((x-)?mailing-)?list(-(archive|help|id|name|owner|post|(un)?subscribe))?:|(x-)?beenthere:
    {
        .
        .
        .
    }

will probably catch most of them.

        John
        
-- 

John Conover, conover(_at_)rahul(_dot_)net, http://www.johncon.com/

____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list   Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail