At 13:01 2006-02-12 +0100, Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:
In-Reply-To: "Eron Crites" <emcrites(_at_)msn(_dot_)tld>'s message of
Sat, 11
Feb 2006 22:26:42 -0700
See RFC 2822: CFWS is Comment-allowed Folding-allowed WhiteSpace.
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:57:16 -0800 Professional Software Engineering
<PSE-L(_at_)mail(_dot_)professional(_dot_)org> wrote:
comments yes, but the basic content of the In-Reply-To: is supposed to be a
message-id. There isn't one being presented there.
And the message ID of the original message to which he was replying was
nowhere in the headers or body of his reply. If I were to be building a
threaded archive of a list to which there were WebTV subscribers I would
have to go in and manually correct the headers of all of their messages.
It might be possible to do it programmatically but it would require:
1. Check the WebTV user message headers for an IRT header to determine if
it is a reply or a new message to the list
2. Read the email address and date/time from the WebTV IRT header
3. Search the mail store (mbox probably) for a message that has a From:
header that matches the retrieved address and a Date header than matches
the retrieved date/time
4. Read the Message-ID header from that message
5. Rewrite the IRT header in the inbound WebTV message.
6. Pass the rewritten message to the archive mail store.
I think it would be easier to find a webmail setup that works with WebTV
and set it up then offer the WebTV user a local mail account for use with
the list. <grin>.
Gerald
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail