On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 01:47:06PM +0100, Rado S wrote:
=- Mike Peeler wrote on Wed 6.Dec'06 at 18:40:49 -0500 -=
There's no problem with :0B. The problem is, some recipe
used :0H. As H is the default, that recipe must have used
:0HB. So, to fix the problem at the source, change that recipe
:to use " * HB ?? ". Doesn't that make more sense?
Knowing the nature of the problem now, this might have been a
solution, but given my context where I need :0BH: very often, it's
easier to do it my way, because there are less cases needing "B ??"
than "HB ??"
Again, Rado: since "HB" (equivalent to "BH") is the default, then
please tell me how "0BH:" is any different from just "0:"?
Not trying to be curmugeounly; just trying to understand you.
Dallman
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail