On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Dallman Ross wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 11:32:18AM +0200, Udi Mottelo wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Justin Zygmont wrote:
Does anyone know of a way so the email attachments are not searched in a
recipe? I have several recipes that look like this, and they are
finding a match from inside the email attachments.
:0B
* QCPC
/var/mail/spambox
:0B
* HPGI
/var/mail/spambox
Well known problem. The following helps me more then 8 years:
:0B
* ()\<QCPC\>
/var/mail/spambox
btw, you can join the recipes:
:0B
* ()\<(QCPC|HPGI)\>
/var/mail/spambox
You have confused me no end now. What is this magic string-pair,
QCPC|HPGI, that you have been searching against for eight years and
that the OP also wants to search against? I have no such string in
any of my recent spam, and I have been examining spam for years and
have no a-ha moment about those particular strings with regard to
spam markers. What the hell?
Or are you saying you have used word-delimited body searches for
8 years, but not necessarily with these particular two "words" in
mind?
I'm sorry Dallman, you right. Because of my poor English
I try to short my messages as possible and in this case it
was too short!
I mean that more then 8 years I use the word-delimiter to
avoid mistake when the words that I'm looking for are very
short or looked no-meaning like this "QCPC".
I use "()" for 5 years and 7 months; "|" in regular-
exprassions more then 2 year 6 months and 19 days :-)
Bye,
Udi
Dallman
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail