On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Google Kreme wrote:
On 15-Apr-2007, at 07:11, Udi Mottelo wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Skip Brott wrote:
[...]
:0fw
* !^X-Spam-Flag:(.*\<)?yes
* !^X-Loop:(.*\<)?spam
Be careful with this (.*\<)? It's a little tricky!!
I guss that you wanted to say: ^X-Loop:.*\<spam\>
No, I said what I meant.
Is Google Kreme == Skip Brott ? I'm sure Google Kreme is
not a beginner!
Some examples to show that \< can be substitute for NEWLINE
but, not all the times:
There are no newlines in headers because procmail unfolds headers.
:0 HB
You should never specify the H flag due to a bug in procmail.
I do it when I prepare instant recipe for instant check
by using echo or whatever extemporize.
Bye,
Udi
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail