Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 07:14:31PM -0400, Yakov Shafranovich wrote:
| We would like to have someone else other than the proposal authors
| coordinate this. Alan DeKok has volunteered. Is he agreeable to you?
Yes, on the condition that we begin to get concrete results by October 16.
I am optimistic that we can work faster once fewer cooks are in the kitchen.
Ok, as soon as a mailing list is setup we'll begin.
I want to have something to propose at ISPcon on the 21st. If the
unification effort has not made progress by then, I reserve the right to
present SPF as the next best thing. I believe this is justified because
the new technique I described is inclusive and allows users to specify
which actual protocol they want to apply as policy, and is therefore
forward-compatible.
If there has not been progress by then, AND you are planning on
presenting your proposal, please make sure that it is NOT being
presented on behalf of the ASRG, unless both Paul and myself consent.
BTW, Paul will be at ISP Con as well as well as several other ASRGers.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡