On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 04:57:34PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
|
| Meng Weng Wong writes:
| >ouch. if you don't pass in a meaningful sender, Mail::SPF::Query will
| >use the helo domain.
|
| BTW this seems to work very well indeed:
|
| 2.815 0.0000 3.0571 0.000 0.92 -0.10 T_SPF_PASS
| 0.063 0.4577 0.0295 0.939 0.74 0.10 T_SPF_FAIL
|
| 3% of nonspam gets SPF "pass", 0.45% of spam gets "fail" -- which isn't
| bad, given how early in the stdization process it's at.
|
| Ignore the 0.0295% -- that was an error in my own SPF setup, cough ;)
|
| So how naughty is it to use HELO data instead of MAIL FROM for the
| SPF check? ;)
|
If you update your version of Mail::SPF::Query, you should see that it
actually wants a helo argument. It's needed for the null-sender case
--- MAIL FROM: <>.
NAME
Mail::SPF::Query - query Sender Permitted From for an IP,email,helo
SYNOPSIS
my $query = new Mail::SPF::Query (ip => "127.0.0.1",
sender=>'foo(_at_)example(_dot_)com',
helo=>"somehost.example.com");
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡