-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Russell Kroll writes:
Is it really worth the trouble of trying to make this fit into DNS?
Yes. DNS' cacheability, nice async libraries, pervasive support,
ability to get through firewalls etc. is very helpful, and SPF is
still quite conceptually similar to stuff like in-addr.arpa. It's
still DNS, fundamentally.
BTW on the other issue -- use of TXT or a new RR -- I strongly recommend
sticking with TXT. I would say a good 97% of potential SPF deployers
would not have the ability (or access) to patch and rebuild their DNS
server to support a new RR.
- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
iD8DBQE/k1UlQTcbUG5Y7woRAixJAKDE4IB1LI1o0BUwLPR9o9+dfSx7xgCfQ42g
uGEs4Y+SKgwV2JHi7QdskLU=
=I5hB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡