Tim Gladding wrote:
OK, I'm not saying we should ignore the RFC completely. I'm
suggesting
that we don't utilize the 'feature' that allows multiple PTR records
:-)
However, if by not utilizing the feature we also make the assumption
that a PTR will have a single record, then we will be ignoring the RFC.
I don't see any way to ignore that PTRs may have multiple records and
comply with the RFC concurrently. I suggest we comply with the RFC and
check for multiple PTR records per address.
---
Dustin D. Trammell
Vulnerability Remediation Alchemist
Citadel Security Software, Inc.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.6.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ë ù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com