spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Arguments regarding "complexity"

2003-12-19 13:14:55
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:20:06AM -0800, Greg Connor wrote:
| Regarding complaints that SPF is "too complex" ...  I wonder if it would 
| help or hurt the cause to have some recommendations for a "minimal" 
| implementation of SPF.  This might address concerns such as Eric Allman's 
| "must be doable in rules"...

My response to claims that SPF is "too complex" is this:

If you are a major antispam company, or a major MTA vendor, and you are
having trouble adding SPF support, I will pay an independent contractor
to do it for you.

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡