Re: another problem with crypto

On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 19:15 +0100, list+spf-discuss(_at_)doeblitz(_dot_)net 
wrote:
> IMHO this is also an argument against crypto-based alternatives to SPF. 
> Breaking signatures is a worse problem than enevlope sender rewriting when 
> forwarding mail.
You can come up with a method of signing which is fairly resilient to
the traditional munging done by mailing lists &c.

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/sender-auth/2004-February/000015.html

-- 
dwmw2