This is already a shame dude.
Instead of people joining and creating something cool together these
bulshits are poping out.
That's why I still don't believe these anti forgery stuff will work.
What's yahoo position regarding SPF and Sender keys since they are
deploying their own domain keys stuff?
Mark, let us know what ur friend says about this license.
[]s
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:39:24 -0700, Mark C. Langston
<mark(_at_)bitshift(_dot_)org> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:15:26PM +0200, Koen Martens wrote:
Does this also mean that in effect, large parts of the spf syntax are
now microsofts property or will be so in the near future?
That's my current worry, and now I'm actually considering having an IP
lawyer friend of mine look over the language to see whether or not
Microsoft would have a case if they came after me for implementing SPFv1
checks in my software.
If that's true, it's a crying shame.
--
Mark C. Langston GOSSiP Project Sr. Unix SysAdmin
mark(_at_)bitshift(_dot_)org http://sufficiently-advanced.net
mark(_at_)seti(_dot_)org
Systems & Network Admin Distributed SETI Institute
http://bitshift.org E-mail Reputation http://www.seti.org
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com