SPF Discuss (thread)
Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier.,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/08/27
- RE: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., Jake S, 2004/08/27
- RE: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., Paul Iadonisi, 2004/08/27
- RE: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/27
- Re: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/27
- Re: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., Ken Simpson, 2004/08/27
- Re: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., william(at)elan.net, 2004/08/28
- Re: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/28
- Re: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., Graham Murray, 2004/08/28
- Re: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., wayne, 2004/08/29
- Re: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., william(at)elan.net, 2004/08/29
- Re: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., wayne, 2004/08/29
- Re: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., william(at)elan.net, 2004/08/30
- RE: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., AccuSpam, 2004/08/28
- Message not available
- Message not available
- RE: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., Paul Howarth, 2004/08/28
- SPF and RBL email checker now also does HashCash, Chris Drake, 2004/08/28
- Ps: SPF and RBL email checker now also does HashCash (CallerID as well), Chris Drake, 2004/08/28
- RE: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., AccuSpam, 2004/08/28
- Re: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/08/29
- Re: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., Koen Martens, 2004/08/28
- PRA - purported responsible address, jpinkerton, 2004/08/28
- Re: PRA - purported responsible address, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/28
- Re: PRA - purported responsible address, jpinkerton, 2004/08/29
- Re: PRA - purported responsible address, AccuSpam, 2004/08/28
- Re: PRA - purported responsible address, Greg Connor, 2004/08/28
- Re: PRA - purported responsible address, Koen Martens, 2004/08/29
- Re: PRA - purported responsible address, jpinkerton, 2004/08/29
- Re: PRA - purported responsible address, AccuSpam, 2004/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: PRA - purported responsible address, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/29
- Re: PRA - purported responsible address, AccuSpam, 2004/08/29
- RE: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., AccuSpam, 2004/08/28
- Re[2]: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., christopher, 2004/08/28
- RE: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., guy, 2004/08/28
- RE: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., AccuSpam, 2004/08/28
- RE: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., Holm, Mark, 2004/08/30
- Fw: Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier., jpinkerton, 2004/08/30
RE: Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption,
Stuart D. Gathman,
2004/08/25
- RE: Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption, AccuSpam, 2004/08/25
- RE: Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption, AccuSpam, 2004/08/25
- RE: Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/25
- RE: Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/25
- RE: Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption, AccuSpam, 2004/08/25
- Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption, Roger Moser, 2004/08/25
- Re: Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption, AccuSpam, 2004/08/25
- Message not available
- Re: Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/25
- Re: Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption, AccuSpam, 2004/08/25
- RE: Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption, AccuSpam, 2004/08/25
- Message not available
- Message not available
- RE: Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/25
- RE: Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/25
- Re: Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption, Paul Howarth, 2004/08/26
- RE: Suggest New Mechanism Prefix NUMBER to Accelerate SPF Adoption, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/26
[Fwd: DEPLOY: Microsoft Patent license unworkable with GPLed MTAs],
Paul Iadonisi,
2004/08/24
- Re: [Fwd: DEPLOY: Microsoft Patent license unworkable with GPLed MTAs], Holm, Mark, 2004/08/25
- Re: Re: [Fwd: DEPLOY: Microsoft Patent license unworkable with GPLed MTAs], Alan Hodgson, 2004/08/25
- Re: Re: [Fwd: DEPLOY: Microsoft Patent license unworkable with GPLed MTAs], Paul Iadonisi, 2004/08/25
- Re: Re: [Fwd: DEPLOY: Microsoft Patent license unworkable with GPLed MTAs], Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/08/25
- Re: Re: [Fwd: DEPLOY: Microsoft Patent license unworkable with GPLed MTAs], Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/26
- RE: Re: Re: [Fwd: DEPLOY: Microsoft Patent license unworkable with GPLed MTAs], guy, 2004/08/26
- Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: DEPLOY: Microsoft Patent license unworkable with GPLed MTAs], jpinkerton, 2004/08/28
- RE: Re: Re: [Fwd: DEPLOY: Microsoft Patent license unworkable with GPLed MTAs], guy, 2004/08/28
- RE: Re: Re: [Fwd: DEPLOY: Microsoft Patent license unworkable with GPLed MTAs], AccuSpam, 2004/08/28
Re: Patent license,
Holm, Mark,
2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, Alan Hodgson, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, wayne, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, Michel Bouissou, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, Koen Martens, 2004/08/24
- RE: Patent license, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/24
- RE: Patent license, Ryan Malayter, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, Holm, Mark, 2004/08/24
- RE: Patent license, Ryan Malayter, 2004/08/24
[andy(_at_)hxr(_dot_)us: Working Group Last Call on Sender ID documents],
Stephane Bortzmeyer,
2004/08/24
- Sender ID and Return Path, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/24
- Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Graham Murray, 2004/08/24
- Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Andrew W . Donoho, 2004/08/25
- RE: Sender ID and Return Path, John Glube, 2004/08/26
- RE: Sender ID and Return Path, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/26
- Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Jeremy Harris, 2004/08/31
- RE: Sender ID and Return Path, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/31
- Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Jeremy Harris, 2004/08/31
- Re: Sender ID and Return Path, william(at)elan.net, 2004/08/31
- Patent license, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, william(at)elan.net, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, Koen Martens, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, Rodolfo Sikora, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, william(at)elan.net, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, Michel Bouissou, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, wayne, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/24
- Re: Re: Patent license, Chuck Mead, 2004/08/24
- Re: Re: Patent license, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, jpinkerton, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, wayne, 2004/08/24
- RE: Patent license, Seth Goodman, 2004/08/24
- RE: Patent license, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/08/24
- Re: Patent license, jpinkerton, 2004/08/24
spfd,
Doug Jolley,
2004/08/23
Re: Fw: Received your email,
administrator,
2004/08/23
- Re: Fw: Received your email, administrator, 2004/08/23
- Re: Fw: Received your email, Alan Hodgson, 2004/08/23
- Re: Fw: Received your email, Mark, 2004/08/23
- Re: Fw: Received your email, Chuck Mead, 2004/08/23
- Re: Fw: Received your email, Mark, 2004/08/23
- Re: Fw: Received your email, David Woodhouse, 2004/08/23
- Re: Fw: Received your email, Mark, 2004/08/23
- Re: Fw: Received your email, David Woodhouse, 2004/08/24
- Re: Fw: Received your email, Karl Prince, 2004/08/24
- Re: Fw: Received your email, administrator, 2004/08/24
- RE: Fw: Received your email, Ring, John C, 2004/08/24
- Re: Fw: Received your email, administrator, 2004/08/25
- Re: Fw: Received your email, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/25
- RE: Fw: Received your email, terry, 2004/08/25
- Re: Fw: Received your email, David Woodhouse, 2004/08/25
- Re: Fw: Received your email, Chuck Mead, 2004/08/25
- Re: Fw: Received your email, Koen Martens, 2004/08/25
- Re: Fw: Received your email, Mark, 2004/08/25
- Re: Fw: Received your email, administrator, 2004/08/26
Can SPF identify wildcard domain forgery?,
AccuSpam,
2004/08/21
- Can SPF identify wildcard domain forgery?, Roger Moser, 2004/08/21
- Re: Can SPF identify wildcard domain forgery?, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/21
- Re: Can SPF identify wildcard domain forgery?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/08/21
- Re: Can SPF identify wildcard domain forgery?, Graham Murray, 2004/08/21
- Can SPF identify wildcard domain forgery?, Roger Moser, 2004/08/22
- Can SPF identify wildcard domain forgery?, Roger Moser, 2004/08/26
- Can SPF identify wildcard domain forgery?, Roger Moser, 2004/08/26
Shelby,
Jesse Gordon,
2004/08/21
Please halt the discussion of SenderKeys,
wayne,
2004/08/21
- Re: Please halt the discussion of SenderKeys, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/21
- Re: Please halt the discussion of SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/21
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Please halt the discussion of SenderKeys, wayne, 2004/08/21
- Re: Re: Please halt the discussion of SenderKeys, John Keown, 2004/08/21
- Re: Please halt the discussion of SenderKeys, william(at)elan.net, 2004/08/21
- Re: Re: Please halt the discussion of SenderKeys, Mark, 2004/08/21
Email forwarding w/o submission service,
Barry Margolin,
2004/08/21
- Re: Email forwarding w/o submission service, Koen Martens, 2004/08/21
- Re: Email forwarding w/o submission service, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/21
- Re: Email forwarding w/o submission service, Frank Ellermann, 2004/08/21
- Re: Email forwarding w/o submission service, Nick Phillips, 2004/08/21
- Email forwarding w/o submission service, Roger Moser, 2004/08/22
- RE: Email forwarding w/o submission service, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/23
Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...],
jpinkerton,
2004/08/20
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], Tim Kennedy, 2004/08/20
- RE: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/20
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], jpinkerton, 2004/08/20
- RE: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/20
- RE: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], Chuck Mead, 2004/08/20
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], Koen Martens, 2004/08/20
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/08/20
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- RE: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/20
- RE: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], Mark, 2004/08/20
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss)Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], Mark, 2004/08/20
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss)Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], AccuSpam, 2004/08/21
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss)Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], Mark, 2004/08/21
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss)Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], AccuSpam, 2004/08/21
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], jpinkerton, 2004/08/21
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], AccuSpam, 2004/08/21
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re:(spf-discuss)Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], Mark, 2004/08/21
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re:(spf-discuss)Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], AccuSpam, 2004/08/21
- Message not available
- RE: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], David Woodhouse, 2004/08/21
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss)Good Domain List one step closer to reality...], David Brodbeck, 2004/08/21
Fw: Received your email: [(spf-discuss) Fw: Received your email: (Re: (spf-discuss) Ope...],
Mark,
2004/08/20
- Re: Fw: Received your email: [(spf-discuss) Fw: Received your email: (Re: (spf-discuss) Ope...], David Woodhouse, 2004/08/20
- Re: Fw: Received your email: [(spf-discuss) Fw: Received your email: (Re: (spf-discuss) Ope...], Tim Kennedy, 2004/08/20
- Re: Fw: Received your email: [(spf-discuss) Fw: Received your email: (Re: (spf-discuss) Ope...], John A. Martin, 2004/08/20
- RE: Fw: Received your email: [(spf-discuss) Fw: Received your email: (Re: (spf-discuss) Ope...], guy, 2004/08/20
- Re: Fw: Received your email: [(spf-discuss) Fw: Received your email: (Re: (spf-discuss) Ope...], Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/08/20
- Re: Fw: Received your email: [(spf-discuss) Fw: Received your email: (Re: (spf-discuss) Ope...], AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- RE: Fw: Received your email: [(spf-discuss) Fw: Received your email: (Re: (spf-discuss) Ope...], AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- Message not available
- Re: Fw: Received your email: [(spf-discuss) Fw: Received your email: (Re: (spf-discuss) Ope...], Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/08/20
- Message not available
- RE: Fw: Received your email: [(spf-discuss) Fw: Received your email: (Re: (spf-discuss) Ope...], David Brodbeck, 2004/08/21
- Re: Fw: Received your email: [(spf-discuss) Fw: Received your email: (Re: (spf-discuss) Ope...], Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/08/21
Fw: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys],
Mark,
2004/08/20
- Fw: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys], Mark, 2004/08/21
- Re: Fw: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys], AccuSpam, 2004/08/21
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Fw: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys], Mark, 2004/08/21
- Re: Fw: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys], AccuSpam, 2004/08/21
- RE: Fw: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys], guy, 2004/08/21
- Re: Fw: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys], Mark, 2004/08/21
- Re: Fw: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys], Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/08/21
- Re: Fw: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) OpeningDebate on SPF vs. SenderKeys], Mark, 2004/08/21
- Re: Fw: Received your email: [Re: (spf-discuss) OpeningDebate on SPF vs. SenderKeys], Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/08/21
- Message not available
- Message not available
Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys,
AccuSpam,
2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Jason Gurtz, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, aSe, 2004/08/20
- RE: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, aSe, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- RE: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, jpinkerton, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Koen Martens, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- RE: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Ben Damm, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Ken Simpson, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Tim Kennedy, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Mark, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/20
- RE: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, jpinkerton, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Tim Kennedy, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- RE: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/20
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Chuck Mead, 2004/08/20
- RE: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- RE: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, jpinkerton, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Chuck Mead, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Dobes Vandermeer, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Dobes Vandermeer, 2004/08/20
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/20
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/20
- Message not available
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, AccuSpam, 2004/08/20
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Mark, 2004/08/21
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Mark, 2004/08/21
- RE: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, guy, 2004/08/21
- Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Roger Moser, 2004/08/21
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Greg Wooledge, 2004/08/23
- RE: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/08/23
- RE: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/23
- RE: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/08/23
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/23
- RE: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/23
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Koen Martens, 2004/08/23
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, wayne, 2004/08/23
- Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys, Greg Wooledge, 2004/08/23
Re: Perfect Spam Blocking with SPF -- Update,
David Lawless,
2004/08/19
- Re: Perfect Spam Blocking with SPF -- Update, Tim Kennedy, 2004/08/19
- RE: Perfect Spam Blocking with SPF -- Update, Mark Smith, 2004/08/19
- RE: Perfect Spam Blocking with SPF -- Update, Seth Goodman, 2004/08/19
- Re: Perfect Spam Blocking with SPF -- Update, Koen Martens, 2004/08/20
- Re: Perfect Spam Blocking with SPF -- Update, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/20
- Re: Perfect Spam Blocking with SPF -- Update, David Lawless, 2004/08/20
Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF,
Scott Kitterman,
2004/08/19
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Rodolfo Sikora, 2004/08/19
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/19
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Rodolfo Sikora, 2004/08/19
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/20
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/08/23
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, AccuSpam, 2004/08/23
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, guy, 2004/08/23
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/08/23
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/23
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/23
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, jpinkerton, 2004/08/23
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/24
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/24
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Guy, 2004/08/24
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/24
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/24
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Seth Goodman, 2004/08/24
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Koen Martens, 2004/08/24
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Alan Hodgson, 2004/08/24
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, AccuSpam, 2004/08/24
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/24
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/24
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Koen Martens, 2004/08/25
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Rodolfo Sikora, 2004/08/25
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Koen Martens, 2004/08/26
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/24
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/24
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Guy, 2004/08/24
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/24
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/24
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/24
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, AccuSpam, 2004/08/24
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/24
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/08/24
- Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Roger Moser, 2004/08/25
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/25
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, rgreene(_at_)tclme(_dot_)org, 2004/08/25
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/25
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, AccuSpam, 2004/08/25
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Shoaib, 2004/08/25
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/25
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/25
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/25
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/25
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/25
SES,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/08/17
- Re: SES, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/17
- Re: SES, David Woodhouse, 2004/08/17
- Re: SES, Koen Martens, 2004/08/17
- Re: SES, Mark, 2004/08/17
- Re: SES, David Woodhouse, 2004/08/18
Re:Why will SPF stop SPAM,
Holm, Mark,
2004/08/17
- Re: Why will SPF stop SPAM, Koen Martens, 2004/08/17
- Why will SPF stop SPAM, Roger Moser, 2004/08/17
- Re: Re:Why will SPF stop SPAM, Mark, 2004/08/17
- Re: Why will SPF stop SPAM, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/08/18
- RE: Why will SPF stop SPAM, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/17
.name help,
Anthony DePinto,
2004/08/17
- Re: .name help, Koen Martens, 2004/08/17
- RE: .name help, Anthony DePinto, 2004/08/17
- Re: .name help, Koen Martens, 2004/08/17
- .name help, Roger Moser, 2004/08/17
- Re: .name help, Koen Martens, 2004/08/17
- .name help, Roger Moser, 2004/08/17
- Re: .name help, Koen Martens, 2004/08/17
- .name help, Roger Moser, 2004/08/17
- Re: .name help, Koen Martens, 2004/08/17
- RE: .name help, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/08/18
- RE: .name help, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/18
- Sub domains, guy, 2004/08/18
- Re: Sub domains, Koen Martens, 2004/08/19
- Re: Sub domains, Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/19
- Re: Sub domains, Koen Martens, 2004/08/19
- Re: Sub domains, Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/19
- RE: Sub domains, guy, 2004/08/19
- Re: Sub domains, Koen Martens, 2004/08/19
- Re: Sub domains, Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/19
- RE: Sub domains, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/19
- Re: Sub domains, Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/19
- Re: Sub domains, Koen Martens, 2004/08/19
- RE: Sub domains, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/19
- Re: Sub domains, Koen Martens, 2004/08/19
- Re: Sub domains, Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/19
- Re: Sub domains, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/20
- RE: Sub domains, Seth Goodman, 2004/08/23
- Re: Sub domains, jpinkerton, 2004/08/19
- Re: Sub domains, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/19
- Re: Sub domains, Koen Martens, 2004/08/19
- Re: Sub domains, william(at)elan.net, 2004/08/19
- RE: .name help, Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/08/19
Why will SPF stop SPAM.,
guy,
2004/08/16
- Re: Why will SPF stop SPAM., Tom Corwine, 2004/08/16
- Re: Why will SPF stop SPAM., Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/16
- Re: Why will SPF stop SPAM., Paul Howarth, 2004/08/16
- Re: Why will SPF stop SPAM., David Woodhouse, 2004/08/17
- Re: Why will SPF stop SPAM., Koen Martens, 2004/08/17
- Re: Why will SPF stop SPAM., Fridrik Skulason, 2004/08/17
- Re: Why will SPF stop SPAM., SmallFries, 2004/08/17
- Re: Why will SPF stop SPAM., Rodolfo Sikora, 2004/08/17
- Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/08/17
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Paul Howarth, 2004/08/17
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/08/18
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/08/18
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Dotzero, 2004/08/18
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, guy, 2004/08/18
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/18
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Rodolfo Sikora, 2004/08/18
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/08/18
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Rodolfo Sikora, 2004/08/19
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Rodolfo Sikora, 2004/08/19
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/18
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Graham Murray, 2004/08/18
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Paul Howarth, 2004/08/19
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/19
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Greg Wooledge, 2004/08/19
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Paul Howarth, 2004/08/19
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Rodolfo Sikora, 2004/08/19
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/19
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/08/19
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Koen Martens, 2004/08/20
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Rodolfo Sikora, 2004/08/20
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/08/19
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Koen Martens, 2004/08/18
- RE: Why will SPF stop SPAM., guy, 2004/08/17
- Re: Why will SPF stop SPAM., Fridrik Skulason, 2004/08/17
- Re: Why will SPF stop SPAM., Koen Martens, 2004/08/17
- Re: Why will SPF stop SPAM., Daniel Taylor, 2004/08/17
- RE: Why will SPF stop SPAM., Guy Watkins, 2004/08/17
- RE: Why will SPF stop SPAM., guy, 2004/08/17
Co-operative 'bulk mail' alerting,
Chris Haynes,
2004/08/16
- RE: Co-operative 'bulk mail' alerting, George Young1, 2004/08/16
- Re: Co-operative 'bulk mail' alerting, Tony Finch, 2004/08/16
- Re: Co-operative 'bulk mail' alerting, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/16
- Re: Co-operative 'bulk mail' alerting, Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/16
- RE: [spf] Co-operative 'bulk mail' alerting, JBritain, 2004/08/17
- RE: Co-operative 'bulk mail' alerting, administrator, 2004/08/18
- Re: Co-operative 'bulk mail' alerting, Mark, 2004/08/18
- Re: Co-operative 'bulk mail' alerting, Mark, 2004/08/18
Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation,
Jonathan Gardner,
2004/08/13
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Tom, 2004/08/13
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, John Glube, 2004/08/13
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/13
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Guy, 2004/08/13
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, jpinkerton, 2004/08/13
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, John Glube, 2004/08/14
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/14
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, John Glube, 2004/08/14
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/14
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, John Glube, 2004/08/14
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/14
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, John Glube, 2004/08/14
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Graham Murray, 2004/08/14
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, John Glube, 2004/08/15
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, John Glube, 2004/08/13
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Frank Ellermann, 2004/08/14
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Koen Martens, 2004/08/14
Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps),
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/13
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/13
- Testing?, Guy, 2004/08/13
- Re: Testing?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/14
- RE: Testing?, guy, 2004/08/14
- RE: Testing?, terry, 2004/08/13
- RE: Testing?, guy, 2004/08/14
- Re: Testing?, Koen Martens, 2004/08/14
- Re: Testing?, Michael Weiner, 2004/08/14
- RE: Testing?, guy, 2004/08/14
- RE: Testing?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/14
- RE: Testing?, guy, 2004/08/14
- RE: Testing?, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/15
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Seth Goodman, 2004/08/15
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/15
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Seth Goodman, 2004/08/15
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/15
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Seth Goodman, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Seth Goodman, 2004/08/17
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Michael Weiner, 2004/08/17
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/17
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Seth Goodman, 2004/08/17
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/18
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/18
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Seth Goodman, 2004/08/18
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/18
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Seth Goodman, 2004/08/18
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/18
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Nick Phillips, 2004/08/19
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), guy, 2004/08/19
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/19
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Seth Goodman, 2004/08/19
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), David Brodbeck, 2004/08/20
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/20
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/18
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/08/18
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), spf, 2004/08/18
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/08/18
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/08/18
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Graham Murray, 2004/08/18
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Dobes Vandermeer, 2004/08/18
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/18
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Koen Martens, 2004/08/19
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Dobes Vandermeer, 2004/08/19
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality(actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/19
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Koen Martens, 2004/08/17
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), guy, 2004/08/15
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), guy, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Greg Wooledge, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Guy Watkins, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Tom, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Hinton, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Ian Peter, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Waitman C Gobble II, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Tom Corwine, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Rodolfo Sikora, 2004/08/17
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/17
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Graham Murray, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), David Brodbeck, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), David Brodbeck, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John A. Martin, 2004/08/16
- RE: Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Guy Watkins, 2004/08/16
- RE: Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/17
- RE: Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), guy, 2004/08/17
- Re: Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/18
- RE: Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), David Brodbeck, 2004/08/18
- Re: Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/18
- RE: Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/18
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Koen Martens, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), David Brodbeck, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/15
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Seth Goodman, 2004/08/16
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), John Glube, 2004/08/16
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Ken Simpson, 2004/08/13
- Co-ordination of activities between MS and SPF for Sender-ID, John Glube, 2004/08/13
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Jonathan Gardner, 2004/08/13
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), terry, 2004/08/12
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Jonathan Gardner, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Tom, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Koen Martens, 2004/08/14
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/08/14
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Koen Martens, 2004/08/14
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/14
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/08/15
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/15
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2004/08/15
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Koen Martens, 2004/08/14
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/14
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Koen Martens, 2004/08/14
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/14
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Greg Wooledge, 2004/08/15
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/14
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Jonathan Gardner, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), George Mitchell, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Jonathan Gardner, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark C. Langston, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Ralf Doeblitz, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Fridrik Skulason, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/14
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), David Brodbeck, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Jonathan Gardner, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Tom, 2004/08/13
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Seth Goodman, 2004/08/15
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Mark, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Tom, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/08/13
- Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), george+spf, 2004/08/13
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/13
- RE: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), jpinkerton, 2004/08/16
how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain,
Jonathan C. Detert,
2004/08/11
- Re: how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, Tom, 2004/08/11
- Re: how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/11
- RE: how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/11
- Re: how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, Tom, 2004/08/11
- Re: how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, Koen Martens, 2004/08/11
- Re: how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, Tom, 2004/08/11
- Re: how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, Len Conrad, 2004/08/12
- Re: how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, Tom, 2004/08/12
- Re: how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/12
- Re: how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, Len Conrad, 2004/08/12
- Re: how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, Tom, 2004/08/12
- Re: how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, Koen Martens, 2004/08/12
- how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, Roger Moser, 2004/08/12
- Re: how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, David Woodhouse, 2004/08/12
- Re: how to avoid receiving email w. sender forged to be a host in my domain, Tom, 2004/08/11
Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems,
Michel Bouissou,
2004/08/05
- Re: Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems, Paul Howarth, 2004/08/05
- Re: Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems, James Couzens, 2004/08/05
- Re: Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems, Jonathan Gardner, 2004/08/05
- RE: Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems, Seth Goodman, 2004/08/06
- Re: Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems, jpinkerton, 2004/08/07
- Re: Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/07
- Re: Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems, jpinkerton, 2004/08/07
- RE: Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/07
- RE: Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems, John Glube, 2004/08/07
- RE: Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems, Seth Goodman, 2004/08/08
- RE: Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems, John Glube, 2004/08/08
- RE: Re: Interaction with anti-spam systems, John Glube, 2004/08/08
inherited SPF record,
Jeremy Kister,
2004/08/05
- Re: inherited SPF record, Koen Martens, 2004/08/05
- Re: inherited SPF record, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/05
- Re: inherited SPF record, Frank Ellermann, 2004/08/05
- Re: inherited SPF record, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/05
- Re: inherited SPF record, Jeremy Kister, 2004/08/05
- Re: inherited SPF record, Jeremy Kister, 2004/08/05
- re: inherited SPF record, systhine, 2004/08/05
- Re: re: inherited SPF record, Koen Martens, 2004/08/05
- Re: re: inherited SPF record, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/05
- Re: re: inherited SPF record, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/08/05
- Re: re: inherited SPF record, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/05
- Re: re: inherited SPF record, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/08/05
- RE: re: inherited SPF record, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/05
- Re: re: inherited SPF record, Guillaume Filion, 2004/08/05
- RE: inherited SPF record, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/05
- RE: inherited SPF record, Matthew.van.Eerde, 2004/08/05
- DNS Wildcards Myth #1, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/05
- Re: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, wayne, 2004/08/05
- DNS Wildcards Myth #1, Roger Moser, 2004/08/05
- Re: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, admin, 2004/08/05
- Re: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, Len Conrad, 2004/08/11
- Re: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, wayne, 2004/08/05
- Re: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, Lou Katz, 2004/08/05
- Re: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/06
- RE: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, terry, 2004/08/06
- Re: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/06
- RE: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, terry, 2004/08/06
- Re: RE: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, Paul Howarth, 2004/08/06
- Re: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/06
- DNS Wildcards Myth #1, Roger Moser, 2004/08/06
- Re: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, wayne, 2004/08/06
- Re: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, william(at)elan.net, 2004/08/07
- RE: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/08/07
- Re: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, Frank Ellermann, 2004/08/08
- RE: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, william(at)elan.net, 2004/08/11
- Re: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, Richard Parker, 2004/08/05
- RE: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/08/05
- Re: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, wayne, 2004/08/05
- Re: DNS Wildcards Myth #1, Greg Connor, 2004/08/07
- Re: Re: inherited SPF record, marc, 2004/08/05
it's morning in san diego,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/08/04
- So ... did Dewey beat Truman?, John Glube, 2004/08/04
- change of version string, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/04
- Re: change of version string, Frank Ellermann, 2004/08/04
- RE: Re: change of version string, John Glube, 2004/08/04
- Re: change of version string, Frank Ellermann, 2004/08/05
- RE: Re: change of version string, John Glube, 2004/08/05
- RE: Re: change of version string, John Glube, 2004/08/05
- Re: change of version string, Frank Ellermann, 2004/08/05
- RE: Re: change of version string, Seth Goodman, 2004/08/05
- RE: Re: change of version string, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/08/05
- Re: change of version string, Frank Ellermann, 2004/08/07
- Re: Re: change of version string, Graham Murray, 2004/08/07
- Re: change of version string, Frank Ellermann, 2004/08/07
- Re: Re: change of version string, Mark Lentczner, 2004/08/05
- RE: Re: change of version string, John Glube, 2004/08/05
- Re: Re: change of version string, Mark Lentczner, 2004/08/05
- Re: Re: change of version string, wayne, 2004/08/05
- Re: Re: change of version string, James Couzens, 2004/08/07
- RE: Re: change of version string, John Glube, 2004/08/05
- Re: Re: change of version string, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/06
- RE: Re: change of version string, John Glube, 2004/08/06
- Re: Re: change of version string, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/06
- Re: change of version string, John Glube, 2004/08/06
- RE: Re: change of version string, John Glube, 2004/08/05
- Re: Re: change of version string, Mark Lentczner, 2004/08/05
- RE: Re: change of version string, John Glube, 2004/08/06
- Re: change of version string, Frank Ellermann, 2004/08/07
- Re: Re: change of version string, James Couzens, 2004/08/07
- Re: change of version string, Frank Ellermann, 2004/08/08
- RE: Re: change of version string, John Glube, 2004/08/09
- Are these dns TXT statements ok?, George Young1, 2004/08/09
- Re: Are these dns TXT statements ok?, Koen Martens, 2004/08/09
- RE: Are these dns TXT statements ok?, George Young1, 2004/08/09
- Re: Are these dns TXT statements ok?, Koen Martens, 2004/08/10
- RE: Are these dns TXT statements ok?, George Young1, 2004/08/10
- Re: Re: change of version string, Mark Lentczner, 2004/08/09
- RE: Re: change of version string, John Glube, 2004/08/09
- Re: Re: change of version string, Mark Lentczner, 2004/08/09
- RE: Re: change of version string, John Glube, 2004/08/10
- Re: Re: change of version string, wayne, 2004/08/05
- Re: Re: change of version string, wayne, 2004/08/05
- RE: change of version string, Seth Goodman, 2004/08/05
- RE: change of version string, James Couzens, 2004/08/05
- RE: change of version string, John Glube, 2004/08/05
- Re: change of version string, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/08/05
- Re: So ... did Dewey beat Truman?, Andrew Newton, 2004/08/05
www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF,
John A. Martin,
2004/08/03
- Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/04
- www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, Roger Moser, 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, Franz J Ehrengruber (iptelenet), 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, Michel Bouissou, 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, wayne, 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, wayne, 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, wayne, 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, John Keown, 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, Franz J Ehrengruber (iptelenet), 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, Paul Howarth, 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, Peter Bowyer, 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, Franz J Ehrengruber (iptelenet), 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, Andy Bakun, 2004/08/08
- Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/04
- Re: Re: www.DNSreport.com flags missing SPF, Mark, 2004/08/04
SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records,
Daniel Lorch,
2004/08/03
- Re: SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records, Koen Martens, 2004/08/03
- Re: SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records, Daniel Lorch, 2004/08/03
- Re: SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records, Daniel Lorch, 2004/08/04
- Re: SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records, Koen Martens, 2004/08/04
- Re: Stats, Michel Bouissou, 2004/08/04
- Re: SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records, Daniel Lorch, 2004/08/04
- Re: More stats, Michel Bouissou, 2004/08/04
- RE: More stats, terry, 2004/08/04
- RE: More stats, Andriy G. Tereshchenko, 2004/08/04
- RE: More stats, James Couzens, 2004/08/04
- Re: More stats, Daniel Lorch, 2004/08/04
- The bickering, Brad Glore, 2004/08/04
- Re: The bickering, Koen Martens, 2004/08/05
- Re: SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records, Koen Martens, 2004/08/04
- Re: SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records, James Couzens, 2004/08/04
- Re: SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/08/03
- Re: SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records, Daniel Lorch, 2004/08/03
- Re: SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records, Koen Martens, 2004/08/03
- Re: SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/03
- RE: SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/03
- RE: SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records, Greg Connor, 2004/08/03
- Re: SPF in a Shared Hosting Environment (non-ISP) -> "Whitelisting only" records, Frank Ellermann, 2004/08/04
Re: Multiple txt records?,
Dan Durrer,
2004/08/02
- Re: Multiple txt records?, wayne, 2004/08/02
- Re: Multiple txt records?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/03
- Re: Re: Multiple txt records?, wayne, 2004/08/03
- Re: Multiple txt records?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/03
- Re: Re: Multiple txt records?, wayne, 2004/08/03
- Error from spfd ?, Pedro Alves, 2004/08/03
- Re: Error from spfd ?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/03
- Re: Error from spfd ?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/03
- Re: Error from spfd ?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/08/03
- Re: Error from spfd ?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2004/08/03
- Re: Re: Multiple txt records?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/08/03
- Re: Multiple txt records?, James Couzens, 2004/08/02
- Re: Multiple txt records?, Koen Martens, 2004/08/02
Re: Case Sensitivity,
wayne,
2004/07/31
- Re: Case Sensitivity, Michel Bouissou, 2004/08/01
- Re: Case Sensitivity, James Couzens, 2004/08/01
- Re: Case Sensitivity, Michel Bouissou, 2004/08/01
- Re: Case Sensitivity, Koen Martens, 2004/08/01
- Case Sensitivity, Roger Moser, 2004/08/01
- Re: Case Sensitivity, Michael Weiner, 2004/08/01
- Re: Case Sensitivity, Koen Martens, 2004/08/01
- Re: Case Sensitivity, Michael Weiner, 2004/08/01
- Re: Case Sensitivity, James Couzens, 2004/08/01
- Re: Case Sensitivity, Michel Bouissou, 2004/08/01
- Re: Case Sensitivity, James Couzens, 2004/08/01
- Re: Case Sensitivity, James Couzens, 2004/08/01
- Re: Case Sensitivity, Koen Martens, 2004/08/02
- Library naming, Christian Brunschen, 2004/08/02
- Re: Library naming, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/08/02
- Library naming, Roger Moser, 2004/08/02
- Re: Library naming, wayne, 2004/08/02
- Re: Library naming, James Couzens, 2004/08/02
- Re: Library naming, Michel Bouissou, 2004/08/02
- Re: Library naming, David Brodbeck, 2004/08/02
- Re: Library naming, James Couzens, 2004/08/02
- RE: Library naming, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/08/02
- Re: Library naming, Christian Brunschen, 2004/08/02
- Re: Library naming, James Couzens, 2004/08/02
- Re: Library naming, Christian Brunschen, 2004/08/02
- Re: Library naming, James Couzens, 2004/08/02
- Re: Library naming, Christian Brunschen, 2004/08/02
- Library naming, Roger Moser, 2004/08/02
- Re: Library naming, Greg Connor, 2004/08/02
- I had hope (was: Re: Library naming), Marc Kool, 2004/08/02
- Re: Case Sensitivity, James Couzens, 2004/08/02
- RE: Case Sensitivity, Scott Kitterman, 2004/08/02
- Case Sensitivity, Roger Moser, 2004/08/02
- RE: Case Sensitivity, Michael R. Brumm, 2004/08/02
- RE: Case Sensitivity, nospam, 2004/08/02