RE: Sender ID and Return Path

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Jeremy 
Harris
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 2:49 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Sender ID and Return Path

Third possibility:

* Permit the spf2/pra record to reference the spf1 record.

See this thread on the MXCOMP list for a discussion of that idea:

http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/msg03409.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[andy(_at_)hxr(_dot_)us: Working Group Last Call on Sender ID documents], Stephane Bortzmeyer Sender ID and Return Path, Meng Weng Wong Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Graham Murray Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Koen Martens Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Waitman C Gobble II Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Andrew W . Donoho RE: Sender ID and Return Path, John Glube RE: Sender ID and Return Path, Scott Kitterman Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Jeremy Harris RE: Sender ID and Return Path, Scott Kitterman <= Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Jeremy Harris Re: Sender ID and Return Path, william(at)elan.net Patent license, Meng Weng Wong Re: Patent license, william(at)elan.net Re: Patent license, jpinkerton Re: Patent license, Koen Martens Re: Patent license, Rodolfo Sikora Re: Patent license, william(at)elan.net Re: Patent license, Nico Kadel-Garcia Re: Patent license, Michel Bouissou

Previous by Date:	Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Jeremy Harris
Next by Date:	Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Jeremy Harris
Previous by Thread:	Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Jeremy Harris
Next by Thread:	Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Jeremy Harris
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]