John Glube wrote:
On Aug 24, 2004, at 07:11, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
[...]
This is a concern that has been voiced to me by several
major sites that are exactly the same set of sites we use
as examples for where we need to stop phishing from. They
are most likely going to publish *both* spfv1 and spfv2/pra
records, and their initial investigation of their email
architectures has indicated that those records are going to
be pushing this real-world 240-byte limit (a 480 byte
effective UDP packet split in two)
His post leads to two possible solutions:
The initial design logic behind changing the version string
was flawed.
The alternative approach?
[...]
* Don’t object to the change of version string for
Sender-ID.
* Accept a sub-domain for publishing the txt email policy
record for Sender-ID.
Third possibility:
* Permit the spf2/pra record to reference the spf1 record.
- Jeremy