Re: Sender ID and Return Path

spf-discuss

Re: Sender ID and Return Path

2004-08-24 08:19:43

Meng Weng Wong <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> writes:

I have a feeling that Sender ID will proceed with an
exclusive focus on the PRA.


Why? Having been following the Marid list for some while, I have seen
far more posts against PRA than for it. Many have posted that an RFC
2821 check, on either or both MAIL FROM or EHLO, needs to be made. So
it should not proceed with an exclusive focus on PRA.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[andy(_at_)hxr(_dot_)us: Working Group Last Call on Sender ID documents], Stephane Bortzmeyer Sender ID and Return Path, Meng Weng Wong Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Graham Murray <= Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Koen Martens Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Waitman C Gobble II Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Andrew W . Donoho RE: Sender ID and Return Path, John Glube RE: Sender ID and Return Path, Scott Kitterman Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Jeremy Harris RE: Sender ID and Return Path, Scott Kitterman Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Jeremy Harris Re: Sender ID and Return Path, william(at)elan.net Patent license, Meng Weng Wong

Previous by Date:	Re: Patent license, jpinkerton
Next by Date:	Re: Patent license, wayne
Previous by Thread:	Sender ID and Return Path, Meng Weng Wong
Next by Thread:	Re: Sender ID and Return Path, Koen Martens
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]