RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation
2004-08-13 16:31:37
I to have my own domains so that my email addresses will be persistent even
if I change ISP's. The system needs to be free, or near free. And only a 1
time fee, not a yearly fee.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of Mark C.
Langston
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 7:20 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 07:08:51PM -0400, John Glube wrote:
To avoid repeating myself, I note the comments I made here:
http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com/200408/0342.html
Any suggestions on some of the specific issues raised concerning
accreditation services would be appreciated.
Just a voice of support. I agree with your position on how an
accreditation system must be run. One quibble:
"* It must be affordable, so as to not amount to a barrier
to entry to micro business owners, while at the same time,
there must be sufficient penalties for non-performance,
such that folks won't want to break the rules. "
I'd s/micro-business owners//g . "Vanity" domain owners (gods, how I
hate that term...I bought my domains to provide myself with a persistent
identity, not to satisfy my vanity) would have to pay as well. If such
an accreditation system could be brought into play in a manner such that
individuals could participate, it'd be wonderful.
You seem to grok the idea that the stick to be wielded with an
accreditation system is not monetary cost, but exclusion from
participation (and other real-world penalties).
--
Mark C. Langston GOSSiP Project Sr. Unix SysAdmin
mark(_at_)bitshift(_dot_)org http://sufficiently-advanced.net
mark(_at_)seti(_dot_)org
Systems & Network Admin Distributed SETI Institute
http://bitshift.org E-mail Reputation http://www.seti.org
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Jonathan Gardner
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Tom
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, John Glube
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Mark C. Langston
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation,
Guy <=
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, jpinkerton
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, John Glube
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Mark C. Langston
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, John Glube
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Mark C. Langston
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, John Glube
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Mark C. Langston
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, John Glube
- Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Graham Murray
- RE: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, John Glube
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Mark C. Langston |
Next by Date: |
Re: Good Domain List one step closer to reality (actually two steps), Ken Simpson |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, Mark C. Langston |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Authentication, Accreditation, and Reputation, jpinkerton |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|