spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Opening Debate on SPF vs. SenderKeys

2004-08-20 19:20:43
David Brodbeck wrote:

AccuSpam wrote:

However, consider that supporting "-all" for SPF (in order to give SPF similar anti-forgery power) for all domains is also going to require upgrades to all MUAs in order to integrate with many different flavors of SMTP authentication at many different servers.

Most server software supports SMTP AUTH, though it isn't always switched on. Most clients also support SMTP AUTH. There's no need to support multiple systems. The only other common system I'm aware of is POP-before-SMTP, but that's pretty crude and I'm not sure it really counts as authentication. It doesn't require any special MUA support, though. ;)


I agree. I don't see this as an issue. People that aren't using SMTP AUTH are just plain crazy IMHO. I have had it set up on my systems for a good long time.

What is troubling is that a _widely_ used client doesn't like to AUTH with a decent mechanism. At least it does SSL.

Best Regards,

Waitman Gobble





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>