Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF

On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 02:00:54PM -0400, guy wrote:
| 
| Now if MTA's would ignore dnsbl.sorbs.net when SPF records validate a
| domain, I would be able to stop using the comcast servers.
| 

If there were a reputation service that told me
watkins-home.com was a good guy, I would happily
implement the logic shown at

http://spf.pobox.com/slides/unified%20spf/0429.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, (continued) RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Stuart D. Gathman RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Seth Goodman Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Koen Martens Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Alan Hodgson Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, AccuSpam Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, David Brodbeck Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, David Brodbeck Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Koen Martens Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Rodolfo Sikora Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Koen Martens Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Meng Weng Wong <= Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Mark C. Langston RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Guy Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Mark C. Langston RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Matthew.van.Eerde RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Scott Kitterman RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Paul Howarth RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Matthew.van.Eerde RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Scott Kitterman RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, AccuSpam Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Meng Weng Wong

Previous by Date:	Re: Patent license, Alan Hodgson
Next by Date:	Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Meng Weng Wong
Previous by Thread:	Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Koen Martens
Next by Thread:	Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Mark C. Langston
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]