Great, but unless it becomes the standard, only a few would accept email
from me.
Guy
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of Mark C.
Langston
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 2:19 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Some thoughts about spam and SPF
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 01:58:34PM -0400, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 02:00:54PM -0400, guy wrote:
|
| Now if MTA's would ignore dnsbl.sorbs.net when SPF records validate a
| domain, I would be able to stop using the comcast servers.
|
If there were a reputation service that told me
watkins-home.com was a good guy, I would happily
implement the logic shown at
http://spf.pobox.com/slides/unified%20spf/0429.html
We're working on it! :)
(We should have an initial limited test release in about two weeks, and
a general release near the beginning of November.)
--
Mark C. Langston GOSSiP Project Sr. Unix SysAdmin
mark(_at_)bitshift(_dot_)org http://sufficiently-advanced.net
mark(_at_)seti(_dot_)org
Systems & Network Admin Distributed SETI Institute
http://bitshift.org E-mail Reputation http://www.seti.org
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
http://www.InboxEvent.com/?s=d --- Inbox Event Nov 17-19 in Atlanta features
SPF and Sender ID.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com