Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF
2004-08-24 18:05:17
David Brodbeck wrote:
Seth Goodman wrote:
I think that Stuart is right, you need an SMTP AUTH service
that prevents domain forgery.
People keep saying this, but so far no one has been able to name such
a service. There are plenty of places out there that do SMTP AUTH,
but are there any that actually prevent cross-customer forgery? If
not, there's no way anyone who doesn't run their own mail server can
use -all.
Actually, I wrote that wrong. You can use -all...but you can't use
+anything. You're stuck in the limbo-land of the "?" operator.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, (continued)
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Seth Goodman
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Koen Martens
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Alan Hodgson
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, AccuSpam
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, David Brodbeck
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF,
David Brodbeck <=
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Koen Martens
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Rodolfo Sikora
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Koen Martens
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Meng Weng Wong
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Mark C. Langston
- RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Guy
- Re: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Mark C. Langston
RE: Some thoughts about spam and SPF, Matthew.van.Eerde
|
|
|