AccuSpam wrote:
I do not know why MUA vendors would support other desired new protocols for
free in past and not SenderKeys. If SenderKeys really stops forgery, and users
want it, then I would expect demand = supply as always in economics.
What I find most amusing about this whole argument is that he argues
it's a flaw in SPF that it "requires" SMTP AUTH, which is already widely
implemented. Then he pitches a system that would require everyone's MUA
to be updated to support a SenderKeys protocol that doesn't even exist yet.