From: "Koen Martens" <spf(_at_)metro(_dot_)cx>
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 01:20:46PM -0700, Mark C. Langston wrote:
With GOSSiP, the it takes as long as the mail administrator decides is
adequate to establish a good behavior baseline. Could be 100 emails,
could be 10,000, or higher. Note that "good reputation" and "bad
reputation" are not the only two categories. There is the unknown
region that Meng describes nicely on the page I mentioned earlier. That
unknown area just means, "proceed with caution -- I either don't have
enough data to declare this identity as having a good or poor
reputation, or their behavior is so inconsistent that their reputation
score hovers between the two." (GOSSiP has another parameter allowing
the system to distinguish between these two cases).
So, accredition means paying big bucks, something only larger companies
can do. Reputation means sending out lots and lots of mails, again
something only big companies do. Again, the smaller companies are
screwed. Great.
I'm a smaller company and I'd be happy with a solution something like GOSSiP
because it *does* have an in-between response which will cover folks who
don't send a lot of mail. Maybe we need another category of response
saying - "This domain has sent less than 100 mails so we can't decide yet
if they're good guys or bad, and you should proceed with caution" - or
something like that.
Slainte,
JohnP.
johnp(_at_)idimo(_dot_)com
ICQ 313355492
P.S. Can Koen send ordinary mails - I have to retrieve his from the server
by hand because they have attachments. Just do it like the ones you send
spf-help, Koen ;-) Ta. :-)