Your list configuratuon got hacked?? Is that the story you will go
with?
Mark give it up.
I also wrote in the same post you quote above:
"so that is why I set my list configuration to daily batch, but like
I said, somehow I got hacked. I do not know how. Perhaps I
accidentally resubmitted my list signup confirmation url or some
obscure bug in your list software"
Uh-huh. So it was a bug in the SPF mailing list software, then, right? And
*I* am the one who should give it up? :)
You see the word "or" in my sentence "I accidentally resubmitted my list signup
confirmation url or..."
What does "or" mean? It is an elemental binary logic element for computer
science.
Even if so, btw, you still remain banned at my server; because I then
consider you a rogue, "owned" zombie, whose output cannot be
trusted. This "I was hacked" story makes for a very lame excuse.
Man, take some responsibility!
So why are you replying to me? Does that make you are liar?
LOL. :) No, it makes me someone who knows enough about headers to tell the
difference between (blocking) the list address and your personal IP address.
I do not have the list blocked, but YOU. :) Case in point.
What good does it do to block my address and still receive messages from me
through the list?
That form of blocking could easily be exploited and is not blocking at all.
Do you not think you should understand headers BEFORE you announce an
anti-spam product?
I do not think it is an issue of understanding the headers. I think
it is an issue of mailing lists not being compatible with some forms
of auto-responders or vice versa depending on your perspective), as
you will see below... But I am willing to try to find a way to make
AccuSpam compatible with your list.
Your insults do nothing to make that a reality.
By all means, keep calling it insults.
Here is the proof that I did understand and my initial conclusion was correct
one (from my perspective):
http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com/200408/0778.html
I was, and still am, giving you the
friendly advice to desist sending any and all autoresponders to people on a
mailing list.
I did like 30 posts and several hours ago. Why are you persisting when I no
longer sending auto-responses to the list?
Is that the best substantive criticism of SenderKeys you can muster
to attack AccuSpam's auto-responder, which has nothing to do with the
SenderKeys Overview that is the subject of this thread?
It certainly tells me a lot about the knowledgeability of the author of
both.
There is no solution to the problem that AccuSpam can do, only the list can fix
the bug, so it says I already knew that:
http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com/200408/0778.html
If we avoid any email with a header that says list, then spammers now
have a way to avoid our auto-responder by just pretending to be a
mailing list.
You got it wrong: if you send those autoresponder messages, then YOU are the
spammer!
LOL. When did an auto-response become spam! ISPs have to follow the ECMA law.
I do not think I have a fight with them. You may wish it to be so,
but it is not.
No. I wish for you not to get yourself blacklisted on a large scale. Sorry
you cannot see that.
We have same wish. So there is no more need for you to continue this topic.
You accomplished your stated goal.
Anything more or are you done attacking me now?
Thanks,
Shelby